- Flynote
-
Application for leave to appeal referred for oral argument in terms of s
17(2)(d) of the Superior Courts Act 19 of 1959 – whether reasonable prospects of success or other compelling reason for appeal to be heard – visitor to resort under control of Municipality – attacked by dog brought onto premises against Municipality’s By-Laws and in the face of prominent signage prohibiting dogs – handler avoided main entrance access control – entered through an unsupervised entry point – court below holding that Municipality acted wrongfully and negligently and held Municipality liable – discussion of relevant principles and case law – no prospect of success and no compelling reason for appeal to be heard.
This document is 554.8 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 10
Judgment 7
- Country Cloud Trading CC v MEC, Department of Infrastructure Development, Gauteng [2014] ZACC 28 (3 October 2014)
- Gouda Boerdery BK v Transnet Ltd (314/2003) [2004] ZASCA 85 (27 September 2004)
- Hawekwa Youth Camp and Another v Byrne (615/2009) [2009] ZASCA 156 (27 November 2009)
- Pro Tempo v Van der Merwe (20853/2014) [2016] ZASCA 39 (24 March 2016)
- Van Meyeren v Cloete (639/2019) [2020] ZASCA 100 (11 September 2020)
- Witzenberg Municipality v Bridgman NO and Others (685/2018) [2019] ZASCA 186 (3 December 2019)
- Za v Smith and Another (20134/2014) [2015] ZASCA 75 (27 May 2015)