- Flynote
-
Company Law – business rescue – revenue received by first
respondent shortly prior to being placed under business rescue – appellant precluded from instituting legal proceedings against first respondent (in business rescue) for recovery of such revenue without the consent of the business rescue practitioners or leave of the court – revenue a debt owed by first respondent to the appellant and not property of appellant – appeal dismissed with costs.
Loading PDF...
This document is 382.7 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 6
Judgment 5
- Chetty v Hart (20323/2014) [2015] ZASCA 112 (4 September 2015)
- Eravin Construction CC v Bekker NO and Others (20736/2014) [2016] ZASCA 30 (23 March 2016)
- Murray NO and Another v Firstrand Bank Ltd t/a Wesbank (20104/2014) [2015] ZASCA 39 (26 March 2015)
- Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Miracle Mile Investments 67 (Pty) Ltd and Another (187/2015) [2016] ZASCA 91 (1 June 2016)
- Trinity Asset Management (Pty) Ltd v Grindstone Investments 132 (Pty) Ltd [2017] ZACC 32 (5 September 2017)
Legislation 1
Documents citing this one 2
Judgment 2
- Airlink Proprietary Limited v South African Airways Soc Limited and Others (11399/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 729 (25 July 2023)
- Khewija Engineering and Construction Proprietary Ltd v Van Den Steen N.N.O. and Another; In Re:Van Den Steen N.N.O. and Another v Khewija Engineering and Construction Proprietary Ltd (12760/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 784 (4 June 2023)