Bailey and Another v Bailey (1324/2019) [2020] ZASCA 178 (18 December 2020)

Jurisdiction: South Africa
Citation: Bailey and Another v Bailey (1324/2019) [2020] ZASCA 178 (18 December 2020)
Media Neutral Citation: [2020] ZASCA 178
Hearing date: 4 November 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
Case number: 1324/2019
Judges: Mocumie JA, Van der Merwe JA, Makgoka JA, Ledwaba AJA, Eksteen AJA
Judgment date: 18 December 2020
Language: English
Type: Judgment
Download: Download PDF (435.4 KB)

Flynote: Family law – interpretation of word ‘remarriage’ in deed of settlement made order of court – means marriage recognised by law – religious Christian ceremony performed not remarriage.

Loading PDF...

This document is 435.4 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top

Bothma-Batho Transport (Edms) Bpk v S Bothma & Seun Transport (Edms) Bpk (802/2012) [2013] ZASCA 176 (28 November 2013)
KPMG Chartered Accountants (SA) v Securefin Limited and Another (644/2007) [2009] ZASCA 7 (13 March 2009)
Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality (920/2010) [2012] ZASCA 13 (16 March 2012)
Novartis v Maphil (20229/2014) [2015] ZASCA 111 (3 September 2015)
Pheko and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality (Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa as Amicus Curiae) [2015] ZACC 10 (7 May 2015)
Stainbank v South African Apartheid Museum at Freedom Park and Another [2011] ZACC 20 (9 June 2011)