- Flynote
-
Criminal law and procedure – murder – intent to kill – dolus
directus – whether present – onus to prove the protection of s 49(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (the CPA) – whether appellants’ objectively and/or subjectively believed their actions to be justified by s 49(of the CPA – Sentence – whether appellants ought to have known that the deceased was a police officer, for sentencing to be brought within the purview of s 51(1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997 – whether 15 years’ imprisonment appropriate.
Loading PDF...
This document is 792.5 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 18
Judgment 15
- Bogaards v S [2012] ZACC 23 (28 September 2012)
- Botha v S (901 of 2016) [2017] ZASCA 148 (8 November 2017)
- Cwele and Another v S (671/2011) [2012] ZASCA 155 (1 October 2012)
- De Beer v S (1210 of 2016) [2017] ZASCA 183 (5 December 2017)
- Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng v Pistorius (96/2015) [2015] ZASCA 204 (3 December 2015)
- Keyser v S (634/2011) [2012] ZASCA 70 (25 May 2012)
- Kruger v S (506/2011) [2011] ZASCA 219 (29 November 2011)
- Phillips v S (370 of 2016) [2016] ZASCA 187 (1 December 2016)
- S Liesching and Others [2018] ZACC 25 (29 August 2018)
- S v Brown (681/2013) [2014] ZASCA 217 (1 December 2014)
- S v Khumalo and Others (216/83) [1984] ZASCA 30 (28 March 1984)
- S v Matyityi (695/2009) [2010] ZASCA 127 (30 September 2010)
- S v Modiga (20738/2014) [2015] ZASCA 94 (1 June 2015)
- S v Romer (412/2010) [2011] ZASCA 46 (30 March 2011)
- S v Williams and Others (CCT 20/94) [1995] ZACC 6 (9 June 1995)