- Flynote
-
Civil procedure – common law remedy – anti-dissipation interdict –
whether it was a requirement for an anti-dissipation interdict for an applicant to
prove that the dispositions were made with the intention of thwarting an
applicant’s pending damages claim or whether there were exceptional
circumstances where a lesser threshold applied – whether appellant satisfied
the requirements of an interim anti-dissipation interdict – foundational
requirements of interim interdict not met. Appeal dismissed with costs including
costs of two counsel.
Loading PDF...
This document is 238.0 KB. Do you want to load it?