Pretoria Hypotheek Maatschappij v Groenewald [1915] ZATPD 24 (16 April 1915)

Reported
Flynote

Practice-Summons -Service -Domicilium citandi -Place of abode -Rule of Court 20.

Case summary

Per BRISTOWE, J : Where a person chooses domicilium citandi, the domicilium so chosen must be taken to be his place of abode within the meaning of Rule of Court 20.


Loading PDF...

This document is 66.4 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top