High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth - 2011 June

2 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
2 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2011
Applicant proved multiple contempts: using confidential designs and circumventing an interdict via intermediaries; suspended sentences and fines imposed.
Contempt of court – civil contempt for disobedience of interdict – requisites: existence of order, service, non-compliance and wilfulness/mala fides – onus and evidentiary shift where knowledge and non-compliance proved. Use of confidential information and designs – manufacture and supply of similar products despite cosmetic differences constitutes breach. Circumvention – interposition of intermediaries and participation in inspections constitute indirect contact/solicitation in breach of interdict. Legal advice defence – equivocal or post hoc advice insufficient to negate dolus eventualis. Remedies – suspended imprisonment for individuals, fine for close corporation, and adverse costs (including attorney-and-client).
15 June 2011
Eviction by an organ of state dismissed for procedural defects, factual disputes and being not just and equitable under section 26.
Eviction — s26 Constitution & PIE — just and equitable inquiry (elderly, children, alternative accommodation); Motion proceedings — genuine dispute of fact (Plascon‑Evans) defeats final relief; Procedural compliance — Rule 6/Rule 17(4)(b) requires description/authority of juristic applicant; Contract — eviction not an express remedy, implications only if necessary; Organ of state landlord considerations.
14 June 2011