|
Reported
Applicants’ attempt to rescind final judgments based on disputed findings amounted to an impermissible appeal; rescission dismissed with costs.
Rule 42 — rescission of judgment; patent error or omission (Rule 42(1)(b)) v. substantive error of reasoning; common mistake (Rule 42(1)(c)) — requirements; functus officio and finality of judgments; locus standi of unrehabilitated insolvents; public protector’s remedial powers and ultra vires limits where no contractual nexus exist.
|