High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth - 2024 March

10 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Outcomes
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 2024
The court found that the parties' marriage was valid under customary law, not affected by civil marriage intentions.
Family law – Customary marriage – Validity of marriage under Recognition of Customary Marriages Act – Requirement of mutual consent.
26 March 2024
Court ordered disclosure of forensic report under PAIA, finding respondent failed to prove confidentiality or private-body status.
Promotion of Access to Information Act – application for forensic report – whether record excluded by s7 where related proceedings concluded; Public v private body – whether State-owned company acted as public or private body when commissioning internal forensic report; PAIA thresholds – s11 (public body) v s50 (private body) and onus on requester; Grounds of refusal – mandatory breach-of-confidence exemption (s37/s65) requires evidentiary proof beyond mere confidentiality clause; Section 80(1) – judicial peek discretionary and unnecessary where holder fails to discharge onus.
22 March 2024
High Court appointed an independent curator ad litem and postponed parental-rights application pending best-interest reports.
Children’s Act – appointment of curator ad litem – investigation of best interests – Family Advocate to assist and report – overlap with Children’s Court appointment – postponement sine die; parties granted leave to supplement affidavits.
19 March 2024
Applicant failed to exhaust PAJA internal remedies and did not bring a timely review; application dismissed with costs.
Administrative law; PAJA s7(1)–(2) — duty to exhaust internal remedies; leave to appeal under FAIS; unreasonable delay and condonation; no exceptional circumstances for exemption; review and execution challenged but dismissed.
19 March 2024
Board not lawfully removed; court orders immediate payment under Service Delivery Agreement and confirms directors’ locus standi.
Municipal entities – removal of directors; interplay between Systems Act s 93G and Companies Act s 71; contractual default under Service Delivery Agreement; arbitration clause and court jurisdiction; joinder and necessary parties; urgency and locus standi.
19 March 2024
Court awarded damages for past and future income loss after accepting expert evidence and applying contingency deductions including reduced life expectancy.
Road Accident Fund – catastrophic amputation – assessment of past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity; reliance on admitted expert reports and actuarial certificate; pre-morbid earnings as basis for actuarial calculation; contingency deductions including diminished life expectancy; separation of past medical expenses (Rule 33(4)); costs including two counsel.
18 March 2024
Accused convicted of murder, attempted murder and firearm possession; POCA and certain counts not proven.
Criminal law – identification evidence and proof beyond reasonable doubt; alibi disclosed late – probative weight and adverse inferences; common purpose liability where co‑accused present, armed and associated with conduct; POCA ss 9(1)(a) and 9(2)(a) require subjective intent to promote a pattern of gang activity; duplication of firearm possession counts and failure of s220 admissions to establish a count.
7 March 2024
Credible identification and rejected alibis supported convictions for murder, attempted murder and firearm offences; POCA charges not proven.
Criminal law – identification evidence – factors: lighting, proximity, prior knowledge, corroboration, inspection in loco, and identification parade Alibi – late-raised alibi may be rejected if unsupported, inconsistent or contradicted; weighs on credibility. Common purpose – presence, awareness, intent/foresight and active association can attract liability for co-accused. POCA (ss 9(1)(a), 9(2)(a)) – requires proof of subjective intention to promote or contribute to a pattern of gang criminality Duplication – continuous possession may render separate counts duplicative
7 March 2024
Applicant misdirected remedy: must execute consent money judgment against the RAF; no basis to order personal relief against branch manager.
Civil procedure — execution of money judgment — consent judgment binding; remedy is execution not personal interdicts against officials; statutory body (RAF) liable under judgment — no personal liability without pleaded delegation of payment authority; Road Accident Fund Act s 17(4)(a) undertaking; post-judgment administrative inquiries criticised.
5 March 2024
Respondent’s failure to investigate contradictory records rendered its pension-calculation decision unlawful, unreasonable and procedurally unfair.
Administrative law – PAJA – procedural fairness – duty to investigate and reconcile employer records before determining pension benefits. Pension law – Government Employees Pension Fund – reliance on employer-submitted form Z102 – obligation to ensure correct pensionable service dates. Judicial review – failure to correct records that materially affect vested pension rights constitutes unlawful and unreasonable administrative action Costs – attorney-and-client costs awarded where respondent’s defences consistently disfavoured by prior decisions in the division
5 March 2024