Human Rights

5 documents
Human Rights
  • Filters
  • Years
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 documents
Title
Jurisdiction
Date
A foreign national without a valid work permit can be an "employee" under the LRA, so the CCMA may have jurisdiction.
Labour law – definition of "employee" (s 213 LRA) – whether dependent on valid common law contract. Immigration law – s 38(1) and s 49 – criminal sanction for employing foreign nationals without permit but no express contractual nullity. Constitutional law – s 23 right to fair labour practices and interpretive obligations (s 39(2), s 233) – purposive interpretation favouring protection of workers. International law – ILO conventions and migrant worker instruments relevant to interpreting labour protections for irregular/unauthorised workers. Administrative law – review standard: whether Commissioner's decision was one a reasonable decision-maker could reach.
Gauteng Judgment 28 March 2008
Reported
Whether refugees may be excluded from private security registration and how s23(6) exemptions must be applied.
Constitutional law – Equality (s9) – Whether excluding non-citizen refugees from registration as private security service providers constitutes unfair discrimination; Administrative law – PAJA – refusal to register/withdrawal of registration as administrative action; Statutory interpretation – s23(6) discretion on ‘good cause shown’ and its role in tempering s23(1)(a); Refugee law – obligations under 1951 Convention and Refugees Act regarding right to seek employment; Remedies – duty to inform applicants and to consider exemptions.
Judgment 12 December 2006
Reported

Human rights and fundamental freedoms - Bill of Rights- access to healthcare - the availability and affordability of medical services, medication, and treatment for HIV positive mothers and their unborn children.

Judgment 4 April 2002
Reported

Human rights and fundamental freedoms - Bill of Rights - violation of the right to equality, human dignity and fair labour practices

Judgment 28 September 2000
Reported
A regulation excluding non‑citizens from permanent teaching posts unfairly discriminates against permanent residents and is unconstitutional.
Equality — Discrimination — Citizenship as an unspecified ground — Differentiation on citizenship can impair dignity and be unfair; protection of citizens' employment does not justify excluding permanent residents; subordinate regulations cannot be read to neutralise unconstitutional discrimination.
Judgment 26 November 1997