3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
|
DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES / NO. (3) REVISED.
DATE SIGNATURE |
Case Number: 25559/2022
In the matter between:
NATHAN EDWIN SASSMAN First Applicant
DESIREE ELIZABETH SASSMAN Second Applicant
And
HARRISON HURSINEY PIENAAR First Respondent
HEIDI JULIA PIENAAR Second Respondent
This judgment was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to the Parties/their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. The date for handing down is deemed to be November 2023.
JUDGMENT: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
POTTERILL J
[1] I have studied the grounds of appeal, read the applicants’ and respondents’ heads of argument and listened to oral argument as to why leave to appeal must be granted or not.
[2] My judgment fully addresses the points raised and I am satisfied no other court could reasonably come to another conclusion.
[3] The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
__________________
S. POTTERILL
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
CASE NO: 25559/2022
DATE OF HEARING: 31 October 2023
FOR THE APPLICANTS: ADV. M. KUFA
INSTRUCTED BY: Machaba Attorneys
FOR THE RESPONDENTS: ADV. M. JACOBS
INSTRUCTED BY: Klagsbruin Edelstein Bosman Du Plessis Inc.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 2 November 2023