This document is 454.4 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 12
Judgment
7|
Reported
|
|
Reported
|
|
Reported
|
|
Reported
|
|
Reported
|
|
Reported
|
|
Reported
|
Act
5|
Citizenship and Immigration
·
Education
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
International Law
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
|
Repealed
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Human Rights
|
Documents citing this one 4
Judgment
4|
Reported
The court held section 4(1)(b) of the Refugees Act constitutional, but found procedural unfairness in excluding the applicant.
Refugees Act – Section 4(1)(b) exclusion – Constitutionality – Procedural fairness in asylum decisions – Internal remedies and appeals.
|
|
Reported
|
|
Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 — constitutionality of sections 35 and 46 — provisions are unconstitutional Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 — constitutionality of sections 67 and 69 — provisions are unconstitutional Unconstitutional — absolute prohibition of access to tax records — right to access to information — right to freedom of expression — right to privacy — section 36 of the Constitution — public-interest override |
|
Refugees Act 130 of 1998 – ss 21 and 22 – contravention of ss 9 and 49(i) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 – respondent found in possession of fraudulent asylum seeker permit and failure on his part to apply for asylum without delay – respondent not entitled to rely on protection afforded by Refugees Act – appeal upheld - appellant entitled to deal with respondent in terms of the provisions of ss 32 and 34 of the Immigration Act |