Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
Judgments
National Legislation
Provincial Legislation
Municipal By-laws
Gazettes
Collections
Subscribe
About
Home
Collections
Case indexes
Refugees
Constitutional law
9 documents
Advanced search
Filters
Constitutional law
Filters
Years
2019
2018
2016
2014
2013
2012
2011
2004
2000
Topics
Administrative Action
Arrest and detention
Asylum Seeker
Bill of Rights
Children's rights
Constitutional Law
Constitutional law
Criminal law
Extradition
Immigration law
International Refugee Law
Persecution based on political opinion
Procedure for the determination of refugee status
Right to work
Rights of refugees
Sentence
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
9 documents
Title
Jurisdiction
Date
Centre for Child Law and Others v Minister of Basic Education and Others (2840/2017) [2019] ZAECGHC 126 (12 December 2019)
Reported
Admission of children to public schools may not be conditioned on possession of identity documents; clauses requiring such documentation are unconstitutional.
Education law; right to basic education – unconditional right of "everyone" under section 29(1)(a); Admission Policy clauses requiring birth certificates or proof of legalisation unconstitutional; administrative action and PAJA condonation; Circular 06 of 2016 set aside; Immigration Act (ss.39, 42) to be interpreted compatibly with Bill of Rights so as not to bar basic education to undocumented children; best interests of the child and equality and dignity obligations; remedies and mandamus to admit children pending documentation.
Eastern Cape
Judgment
12 December 2019
D G v Refugee Status Determination Officer, Cape Town and Others (CCT 217/16) [2018] ZACC 38 (28 September 2018)
Reported
The court held section 4(1)(b) of the Refugees Act constitutional, but found procedural unfairness in excluding the applicant.
Refugees Act – Section 4(1)(b) exclusion – Constitutionality – Procedural fairness in asylum decisions – Internal remedies and appeals.
Judgment
28 September 2018
Minister of Home Affairs v Rahim and Others [2016] ZACC 3 (18 February 2016)
Reported
Detention at places not determined by the Director‑General breaches s34(1) and attracts delictual damages.
* Immigration Act s34(1) — Director‑General required to determine places for detention of illegal foreigners; * Detention in places not so determined unlawful; * Place of detention and lawfulness of detention are inseparable; * Unlawful detention gives rise to delictual damages; * Appellate court will not disturb damages absent misdirection or striking disparity.
Judgment
18 February 2016
Somali Association of South Africa and Others v Limpopo Department of Economic Development Environment and Tourism and Others (48/2014) [2014] ZASCA 143 (26 September 2014)
Reported
Asylum seekers and refugees lawfully present may apply for trading licences; closures under valid permits are unlawful.
Refugee and asylum-seeker rights – right to seek employment and self-employment – interaction of s22 Constitution and s27(f) Refugees Act – Lebowa Business Act, Businesses Act and municipal land-use scheme do not bar non-citizens from applying for trading licences – closures and confiscations under policing operations unlawful – dignity and international obligations considered.
Judgment
26 September 2014
Mail and Guardian Media Ltd and Others v Chipu NO and Others [2013] ZACC 32 (27 September 2013)
Reported
Blanket confidentiality of asylum applications is overbroad; Appeal Board must have discretion to allow media/public access.
Refugee law — confidentiality of asylum applications; Constitutional law — limitation of freedom of expression under section 36; Proportionality — overbreadth of blanket confidentiality; Remedy — declaration of invalidity suspended; interim reading‑in conferring discretion on Refugee Appeal Board.
Judgment
27 September 2013
Centre for Child Law and Others v Minister of Basic Education and Others (1749/2012) [2012] ZAECGHC 60 (3 July 2012)
Reported
Respondents must declare and fill both educator and non-educator school post establishments to protect learners’ right to basic education.
Education law – s100(1)(b) intervention – national executive assumes provincial powers and obligations; Public Service Act and Employment of Educators Act – determination of educator and non-educator post establishments; Schools Act s20 – governing bodies’ role; Norms and Standards – requirement for adequate non-teaching personnel; State duty to respect, protect and fulfil right to basic education; obligation to declare and fill budgeted posts.
Eastern Cape
Judgment
3 July 2012
Tsebe and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (27682/10) [2011] ZAGPJHC 255 (22 September 2011)
Reported
The applicant cannot be extradited or deported to face a real risk of the death penalty absent a written assurance against execution.
Constitutional law – extradition/deportation – right to life and prohibition of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment – S v Makwanyane and Mohamed require written assurance that death penalty will not be imposed or carried out before removal; deportation cannot circumvent this obligation; international law cannot justify conduct inconsistent with the Constitution.
Gauteng
Judgment
22 September 2011
Lawyers for Human Rights and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another [2004] ZACC 12 (9 March 2004)
Reported
Port-of-entry detainees have constitutional protection; s34(8) requires reasonable suspicion and 30-day judicial oversight.
Constitutional law — standing — public-interest standing for NGOs; Immigration law — ports of entry and detention — s34(8) requires reasonable suspicion before detention; Rights — sections 12 and 35(2) apply to all persons physically inside the Republic; Limitation and remedy — read-in 30-day judicial oversight for ship detentions (extension up to 90 days).
Judgment
9 March 2004
Dawood and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Shalabi and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Thomas and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others [2000] ZACC 8 (7 June 2000)
Reported
Section 25(9)(b) read with ss26(3) and (6) unjustifiably permits refusals that infringe spouses’ constitutional dignity and right to cohabit; declaration suspended with interim relief.
Immigration law — Interpretation of s25(9)(b) — Temporary residence permits must be valid at time of grant — Administrative discretion under ss26(3),(6) — Legislative omission as to factors for refusal — arbitrary limitation of constitutional right to dignity/cohabitation — declaration of invalidity suspended with interim mandamus directing officials not to refuse/extend permits absent good cause.
Judgment
7 June 2000
1
>