Electoral Commission v Mhlope and Others [2016] ZACC 15 (14 June 2016)

Reported
Electoral Commission v Mhlope and Others [2016] ZACC 15 (14 June 2016)

Loading PDF...

This document is 558.7 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 33

Act
5
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Human Rights · Infrastructure and Transportation · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Public administration
Public administration
Public administration

Documents citing this one 22

Judgment
22
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported

Review under principle of legality and Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 – rotation of country’s strategic oil stock – decisions and resultant transactions reviewed and set aside – just and equitable relief – factors relevant to assessment – misconduct by state officials – contracting parties innocent – compensation for out-of-pocket expenses appropriate – appeal dismissed.

Reported
Reported
Reported

Interdict to stop coal mining – interpretation of statutes – National
Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA) – environmental
authorisation to undertake listed activity under s 24 – whether required by holder
of mining right and environmental management programme in terms of the
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 – no case made
out for interdict in founding papers – municipal approval of land use – Spatial
Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013, KwaZulu-Natal Planning
and Development Act 6 of 2008 and Mtubatuba Local Municipality Spatial
Planning and Land Use Management By-Law, 2017 – not required by virtue of
transitional arrangements – National Environmental Management Waste Act 59
of 2008 – waste management licence not required by reason of transitional
provision – non-compliance with the KwaZulu-Natal Heritage Act 4 of 2008
relocation of ancestral graves – no reasonable apprehension of harm – interdict
refused.

Reported
Reported