- Flynote
-
Application of the “once and for all” common law rule –– applicable to only one cause of action and not to more than one cause of action –– whether misapplication of the law or development of common law
Loading PDF...
This document is 401.6 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 17
Judgment 17
- Barkhuizen v Napier [2007] ZACC 5 (4 April 2007)
- Boesak v S (CCT 25/00) [2000] ZACC 25 (1 December 2000)
- Booysen v Minister of Safety and Security [2018] ZACC 18 (27 June 2018)
- Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Limited v Mopani District Municipality [2022] ZACC 41 (30 November 2022)
- K v Minister of Safety and Security [2005] ZACC 8 (13 June 2005)
- Loureiro and Others v iMvula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd [2014] ZACC 4 (20 March 2014)
- Member of the Executive Council for Health and Social Development, Gauteng v DZ obo WZ [2017] ZACC 37 (31 October 2017)
- Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Moleko (131/2007) [2008] ZASCA 43 (31 March 2008)
- National Sorghum Breweries (Pty) Limited t/a Vivo Africa Breweries v International Liquor Distributors (Pty) Limited (72/1999) [2000] ZASCA 70 (28 November 2000)
- National Stadium South Africa (Pty) Ltd an Others v Firstrand Bank Ltd (670/2010) [2010] ZASCA 164 (1 December 2010)
- Olesitse N.O. v Minister of Police (470 of 2021) [2022] ZASCA 90 (15 June 2022)
- Paulsen and Another v Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd [2015] ZACC 5 (24 March 2015)
- Pennington and Another v S (CCT 14/97) [1997] ZACC 10 (18 September 1997)
- Phoebus Apollo Aviation CC v Minister of Safety and Security [2002] ZACC 26 (28 November 2002)
- Thebus and Another v S [2003] ZACC 12 (28 August 2003)
- Villa Crop Protection (Pty) Ltd v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH [2022] ZACC 42 (8 December 2022)
- Zealand v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development and Another [2008] ZACC 3 (11 March 2008)