background image
profile image

Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction. The Court was first established by the Interim Constitution of 1993, and its first session began in February 1995. It has continued in existence under the Constitution of 1996. The Court sits in the city of Johannesburg. The Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so. (Banner image credit: By André-Pierre from Stellenbosch, South Africa.)
Physical address
Constitutional Court, 1 Hospital Street, Constitution Hill, Braamfontein, South Africa, 2017
46 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Case actions
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
46 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2023
Reported
Section 12(3) may treat a lawyer‑related legal conclusion as a ‘fact’ where it is necessary to complete a negligence cause of action.
Prescription — Prescription Act s 12(3) — "facts from which the debt arises" — distinction between primary facts and legal conclusions — narrow exception in professional negligence claims against legal practitioners where a legal conclusion is essential to complete minimum facts — knowledge (actual and deemed) and discoverability — access to courts.
18 December 2023
Reported
Unauthorised attorney withdrawal of a labour claim is ineffective; case revived where no ratification, estoppel, or applicant blame for delay.
Labour law — withdrawal of proceedings by attorney without client’s authority; implied/ostensible authority and estoppel; ratification; revival of withdrawn claims; attribution of delay and prejudice in revival applications; constitutional right to access courts (s 34) and fair labour practices (s 23).
12 December 2023
Reported
Whether a lease clause ousts Magistrate’s Court jurisdiction; Court refuses leave to appeal and remits matter.
Jurisdiction clauses — interpretation: consent to jurisdiction v exclusive ouster; whether private parties can oust domestic court jurisdiction; access to courts (s34) and principle of legality in jurisdiction challenges; leave to appeal — interests of justice and prospects of success.
12 December 2023
Reported
Deeming asylum claims abandoned for late visa renewal violates non-refoulement, dignity, children’s rights and is irrational.
Refugee law — Asylum procedure — Visa renewal — Whether automatic deeming of abandonment for failure to renew violates non-refoulement and international refugee obligations. Constitutional law — Rights infringed — dignity, just administrative action, children’s rights, freedom and security of the person, life. Administrative law — Procedural fairness — Standing Committee endorsement and absence of merits adjudication. Rationality review — Whether legislative measure bears rational connection to legitimate governmental aims (backlog reduction, deterrence).
12 December 2023
Reported
Direct access granted; 200/200 seat split to admit independent candidates is constitutional and non-discriminatory.
Electoral law — Electoral Amendment Act — 200 regional / 200 compensatory seat split allowing independent candidates — whether split is rational and consistent with constitutional requirement of proportional representation — risk of overhang — right to vote and to stand for public office — burden of proof on challenger — direct access.
4 December 2023
Reported
Court finds 15% nomination threshold unjustifiably limits political rights; invalidity suspended and interim 1 000‑signature remedy ordered.
Electoral law — independent candidates — nomination/signature threshold (15% of regional quota) — unjustifiable limitation of section 18 (freedom of association) and section 19 (political rights) — declaration of invalidity suspended with interim reading‑in (1 000 signatures); recalculation provisions (items 7, 12, 23) challenged and recalculation relief refused.
4 December 2023
Reported
Immigration provisions forcing foreign parents of South African children to leave or stop work were unconstitutional and read in to protect parental and child rights.
Immigration law — constitutionality of ss 10(6), 11(6), 18(2) of Immigration Act and reg 9(9)(a) — limits on human dignity, family life and children's rights; Section 36 analysis — unjustified limitation; Remedy — suspended declaration of invalidity and reading-in to protect foreign parents of citizen/permanent-resident children; Administrative law — exhaustion of remedies and 'dirty hands' precluding relief.
4 December 2023
November 2023
Reported
Whether provincial executive may impose gambling levies amounting to taxes without complying with section 228 and the Process Act.
Constitutional law – Provincial taxation – Section 228(1) – Provincial Legislature’s power to impose taxes – Dominant-purpose test to distinguish taxes from regulatory charges (Shuttleworth) – Requirement of sufficient nexus between levy and regulatory scheme (Westbank/Greenhouse Gas) – Empowering provisions in provincial gambling statute invalid to the extent they authorise Executive to impose levies as taxes – Repayment (condictio indebiti and s172) – PAJA delay objection dismissed.
29 November 2023
Reported
A court may order in camera review of allegedly privileged documents to balance open justice and legal professional privilege under s32.
Superior Courts Act s32 – open justice principle – legal professional (litigation) privilege – in camera review/judicial peek – balancing privilege and openness – procedure for review of allegedly privileged material – confidentiality undertakings – records to be made public if documents found not privileged.
28 November 2023
Reported
Interpretation and application of Article 13(b): high, forward‑looking 'grave risk' threshold; balancing risk against available protective measures.
Hague Convention (Article 13(b)) – interpretation of 'grave risk' of physical or psychological harm and 'intolerable situation' – standard of proof (balance of probabilities) – forward‑looking enquiry – obligation to consider ameliorative measures in state of habitual residence – summary and expeditious nature of Convention proceedings – courts to avoid converting return applications into merit custody hearings.
27 November 2023
Reported
An officer executing a s43 warrant has no general discretion to refuse arrest; limited manner/timing judgments permitted.
Criminal procedure – Arrests under warrant (s43 CPA) – Executing officer’s powers – No general discretion to refuse arrest under s43(2); s44 'may' denotes who may execute – Contrast with warrantless arrests under s40(1) where discretion to arrest arises – Limited operational/humanitarian value judgments permitted – Costs: punitive order set aside for material misdirection.
14 November 2023
Reported
Once-and-for-all rule applies to a single cause of action; distinct causes of action cannot be barred by that rule.
Civil procedure – "once and for all" rule – applicability limited to a single cause of action; distinct causes of action (unlawful arrest and detention vs malicious prosecution) may be pursued separately. Development of common law – extension/restriction requires compliance with s 39(2) of the Constitution. Constitutional right – denial of adjudication implicates s 34 right of access to courts. Misapplication vs development – where change impacts constitutional rights, higher courts’ jurisdiction engaged.
14 November 2023
October 2023
Reported
Court supplements prior invalidation of detention provisions, imposing interim safeguards and personal cost sanctions.
Immigration law — detention for deportation — constitutionality of s34(1)(b) and (d) — automatic judicial oversight and in-person appearance; Constitutional remedies — limits on revival of lapsed suspension — Court may grant supplementary relief under s172(1)(b); Interim safeguards — interests of justice test, 48‑hour bring‑to‑court rule, limited detention extensions; Costs — personal cost orders against public officials and disallowance of legal representatives’ fees for egregious litigation conduct.
30 October 2023
Section 7(3) of the Divorce Act unlawfully excludes redistribution on death and discriminates by excluding post‑1984 marriages.
Divorce Act s7(3) — redistribution remedy — exclusion where marriage dissolved by death — exclusion where marriage entered into on/after 1 Nov 1984 — equality (s9) — differentiation, indirect discrimination (gender), justification (s36) — reading‑in and suspended declaration — interim read‑in to Matrimonial Property Act (s36A).
10 October 2023
Reported
Whether investigatory disciplinary evidence rendered a criminal trial unfair where convictions rested on formal section 220 admissions.
• Criminal procedure – formal admissions – section 220 C.P.A. – admissions as sufficient proof and generally conclusive. • Evidence – admissibility of employer investigatory/disciplinary evidence in criminal trials – voluntariness and exclusion under s 35(5) Constitution. • Fair trial – whether evidence obtained in disciplinary processes rendered trial unfair – requires demonstrable reliance on such evidence. • Judicial bias – remarks by trial judge do not automatically establish reasonable apprehension of bias absent supporting record. • Constitutional Court jurisdiction – no jurisdiction where alleged irregularity did not raise a serious constitutional issue or failure of justice.
10 October 2023
Reported
A temporally‑limited ministerial power to amend tax Schedules (with parliamentary oversight) is constitutionally permissible; quota regime rational and lawful.
Constitutional law — separation of powers — delegation to Minister to amend Schedules to tax statutes — temporally limited regulatory delegation with parliamentary oversight permissible; Administrative law — rationality and procedural fairness of quota measures — rational connection to legitimate fiscal/anti‑abuse objective; International law — Vienna Conventions allow receiving State laws/regulations (including quantitative limits) to prevent abuse; Money Bills — section 77 not infringed where dominant purpose is regulatory implementation, subject to parliamentary confirmation.
3 October 2023
Reported
PAJA’s 180‑day review period begins when the applicant receives sufficient reasons for the administrative action.
Administrative law — PAJA s 7(1) — 180‑day time period for judicial review — period runs from date reasons for administrative action became known or ought to have become known to the applicant. Adequacy of reasons — a reasoned decision communicated to the applicant starts the PAJA clock; later elaborations that do not supply materially new reasons do not reset the period. Preventing procedural gamesmanship — requests for additional reasons cannot be used to indefinitely delay the PAJA time limit. Export/VAT Regulations — substantive entitlement to VAT refund not decided because procedural bar was dispositive.
3 October 2023
August 2023
Reported
Whether presidential DPP appointments become final on authorised personal notification or require public promulgation, and whether NDPP had authority to notify.
National Prosecuting Authority Act s 13(1)(a) – appointment of provincial DPPs – finality and functus officio; personal versus public notification of executive appointments; authority of NDPP to communicate Presidential decisions; executive action v administrative action (PAJA) – standards of review; legality and rationality of revocation of inchoate appointments.
24 August 2023
Reported
Labour Court’s overlooking of opposing affidavit breached section 34; s145(2)(b) requires improper obtaining proved on balance of probabilities.
Labour law; review of arbitration award under s145(2)(b) LRA — award set aside only if improperly obtained proven on balance of probabilities; constitutional right of access to courts and fair hearing (s34) — overlooking filed opposing papers breaches right to be heard; hearsay and use of affidavits from separate litigation — all related affidavits must be considered; remedy — remit to Labour Court to determine review and rule 11 applications with all admissible evidence.
21 August 2023
Reported
15 August 2023
Reported
2 August 2023
July 2023
Reported
Precautionary suspension lawful absent a real risk of conflict or a reasonable apprehension of bias.
Constitutional law – Chapter 9 institution – suspension under section 194(3)(a) – precautionary suspension lawful where rational to protect office integrity; administrative law – apprehension of bias and conflict of interest – real, reasonable risk required under section 96(2)(b); parliamentary procedure – sub judice rule and rule 129AD(3) – severance by Constitutional Court cures rule defect; confirmation of High Court orders affecting Presidential conduct – sections 167(5) and 172(2)(a); interlocutory execution – section 18 Superior Courts Act.
13 July 2023
Reported
12 July 2023
Reported
Leave to appeal refused where dispute about adequacy of SACE’s investigation was primarily factual, lacking constitutional public-importance.
Administrative law – statutory regulator’s disciplinary powers – adequacy of investigative process under SACEA section 14 – whether reliance on another body’s investigatory report amounts to insufficient investigation; Constitutional jurisdiction – exercise of public power by statutory body – when factual challenges warrant Constitutional Court intervention; Appeal procedure – leave to appeal to Constitutional Court requires arguable constitutional point or public importance and interests of justice.
12 July 2023
June 2023
Reported
Section 4 unfairly discriminates by denying never-married parents streamlined access to the Family Advocate; invalidity confirmed with interim reading-in.
• Constitutional law – equality (section 9) – discrimination on basis of marital status – indirect discrimination by legislative provision allowing streamlined access to Family Advocate only for married/divorcing parents. • Children’s rights – best interests of the child (section 28(2)) – discriminatory limitation impacting children's right to timely, fair processes. • Remedies – declaration of invalidity confirmed, suspended for 24 months; interim reading-in to enable access to Family Advocate; Parliament to cure legislative defect. • Costs – Minister ordered to pay specified High Court costs and applicant awarded costs in Constitutional Court.
29 June 2023
Reported
29 June 2023
Reported
28 June 2023
Reported
A non-member's voluntary, unobjecting participation in self-regulatory proceedings constitutes submission to that body's jurisdiction.
Advertising self-regulation; non-statutory industry body (ARB); submission to jurisdiction by non-member via participation; ad-alert mechanism; judicial avoidance of unnecessary constitutional determinations; appellate restraint on disturbing factual findings.
26 June 2023
Reported
Parliament failed to facilitate required public participation for material amendments expanding the statutory definition of “waste”, rendering those provisions invalid.
Constitutional law — Parliamentary public participation — Sections 59(1)(a) and 72(1)(a) — Material amendments to draft legislation — Definition of “waste” expanded; consequential definitions (“commercial value”, “trade in”) and transitional provision — Failure to facilitate further public involvement — Declaration of invalidity.
26 June 2023
Reported
Section 29(8) unlawfully gives the Minister veto over municipal by‑laws on building matters, infringing municipal autonomy.
Local government – Municipal legislative authority (sections 43(c), 151, 156) – Building Act s29(8) requiring ministerial approval for by‑laws relating to erection of a building – ministerial veto usurps municipal power and breaches separation of powers – interpretive narrow reading cannot save provision – retrospective invalidity applies but cannot produce retrospective criminal liability.
23 June 2023
Reported
Section 12(1) of the Constitution — principle of non-refoulement — section 49(1) and 34 of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 — illegal foreigner’s intention to apply for asylum — lawfulness of detention
12 June 2023
Reported
Whether the Act’s involuntary admission and Review Board regime limits the applicant’s constitutional rights.
Mental Health Care Act — Involuntary inpatient admission (ss 33–34) — procedural safeguards and timing (initial assessments; 72‑hour review; Review Board within 30 days; automatic High Court review) — whether automatic immediate judicial review required — Review Boards’ independence (Chapter IV) — s 12(1), s 34 and s 10 of the Constitution — international law considered (ICCPR, UN Mental Health Principles, CRPD).
9 June 2023
May 2023
Reported
An absolute statutory ban on disclosure of tax records is unconstitutional; PAIA’s public‑interest override must be applicable to taxpayer information subject to safeguards.
Constitutional law — right of access to information (s32) and freedom of expression (s16) — absolute statutory prohibition on disclosure of taxpayer records — whether exclusion of PAIA public‑interest override (s46) is justifiable — Tax Administration Act secrecy provisions — compatibility with privacy, voluntary tax compliance and international exchange obligations — remedy: reading‑in and suspension to allow parliamentary cure.
30 May 2023
Reported
Parliament failed to reasonably facilitate public participation in passing the Traditional and Khoi‑San Leadership Act, rendering it constitutionally invalid (suspended).
• Constitutional law – Parliamentary and provincial obligation to facilitate public involvement – Sections 59(1)(a), 72(1)(a), 118(1)(a) – reasonableness standard for public participation. • Administrative/constitutional procedure – adequacy of notice, pre‑hearing education, accessibility, translation, accurate recording and transmission of submissions. • NCOP–provincial relationship – NCOP may not rely on provincial hearings unless delegates attend or receive accurate reports; provincial shortcomings imputable to NCOP. • Remedy – declaration of invalidity for failure to facilitate public participation; suspension of invalidity to allow re‑enactment. • Costs – adverse costs order against those who opposed the challenge, including costs of three counsel.
30 May 2023
April 2023
Reported
20 April 2023
Reported
An employer may use replacement labour only while a lock-out is responding to an ongoing strike.
Labour Relations Act s76(1)(b) — interpretation of "in response to a strike"; distinction between suspended and terminated strikes; use of replacement labour during lock-outs; protection of right to strike; mootness and interests of justice.
18 April 2023
March 2023
Reported
28 March 2023
Reported
Section 25 allows third‑party use and surrenders; the Act does not bar fees for related transactions.
Water law – Interpretation of s25(1) and s25(2) of the National Water Act – third‑party use and surrender to facilitate licences – legality of fees/transactions – interaction with ss26(1)(l) and 29(2) – constitutional and policy concerns but remedy for redistribution lies with legislature.
15 March 2023
Reported
10 March 2023
February 2023
Reported
Leave to appeal refused as the dispute over B‑BBEE eligibility for the tourism relief fund was moot; costs awarded.
Disaster Management Act and regulations; Tourism Relief Fund selection criteria; use of B‑BBEE status for disaster‑relief grants; administrative action and reviewability under PAJA; constitutional equality (section 9); mootness and interests of justice; refusal of leave to appeal and costs.
8 February 2023
Reported
1 February 2023
Reported
1 February 2023
Reported
1 February 2023
Reported
1 February 2023
January 2023
Reported
24 January 2023
Reported
Whether admitting a deceased eyewitness’s hearsay statement under s3(1)(c) Hearsay Act was in the interests of justice.
Evidence — Hearsay Act s 3(1)(c) — interests of justice balancing test; Criminal procedure — admission of deceased eyewitness’s statement; Fair trial — s 35(3) right to challenge evidence and limits of cross‑examination where declarant is deceased; Identification — cautionary rule for single-witness ID; Corroboration — role of post‑mortem, blood‑spatter and DNA as circumstantial corroboration; Language/translation and procedural safeguards in statement-taking; Common purpose liability where primary identificatory evidence is hearsay.
24 January 2023