Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

Investec Bank Limited v Erf 436 Elandspoort (Pty) Ltd and Others (410/2019) [2020] ZASCA 104 (16 September 2020)

Investec Bank Limited v Erf 436 Elandspoort (Pty) Ltd and Others (410/2019) [2020] ZASCA 104 (16 September 2020)
Citation
Investec Bank Limited v Erf 436 Elandspoort (Pty) Ltd and Others (410/2019) [2020] ZASCA 104 (16 September 2020)
Media Neutral Citation
[2020] ZASCA 104
Hearing date
31 August 2020
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
Case number
410/2019
Judges
Plasket JA, Petse DP, Saldulker JA, Dambuza JA, Poyo-Dlwati AJA
Judgment date
16 September 2020
Language
English
Type
Judgment
Flynote

Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – s 14 of the Act – whether series of
payments in terms of agreement between creditor and debtor were
acknowledgements of liability that interrupted prescription.

Skip to document content
Loading PDF...

This document is 478.8 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Reload page Download PDF
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 5

Judgment
4
Act
1
Prescription Act, 1969
Dispute Resolution and Mediation

Documents citing this one 2

Judgment
2
Madibeng Local Municipality v Public Investment Corporation Ltd (955/2020) [2020] ZASCA 157 (30 November 2020)

Claims for payments of debts – quantum admitted or deemed to be
admitted on the pleadings – Prescription Act 68 of 1969 – s 11(b) – the Public Investment Corporation Ltd not 'the State' for purposes of the running of prescription – 15 year prescription period not applicable – s 14 – partial payments of debts and request for balance owing amounting to tacit acknowledgments of liability interrupting prescription – mora interest – running from date on which debts due.
Christ the King Primary School CC v V F Group Trust (3668/2022) [2023] ZAECGHC 117 (28 November 2023)