H A L obo M M L v MEC for Health, Free State (1021/2019) [2021] ZASCA 149 (22 October 2021)

Reported
H A L obo M M L v MEC for Health, Free State (1021/2019) [2021] ZASCA 149 (22 October 2021)

Loading PDF...

This document is 1.0 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 30

Judgment
23
Reported
Reported

Administrative action – validity of administrative decision not the subject of counter-application or separate review application – beneficiary of decision prejudiced – proper process must be followed to set the decision aside – validity of decision not before the Court.

Administrative action – status of administrative decision improperly taken – decision remains effectual until properly set aside and cannot be ignored – application of Oudekraal judgment.

Reported
Reported
Reported

Medical negligence – plaintiff's case based on expert evidence – requirements for such evidence to be admitted – duties of expert witnesses – direct evidence preferable to reconstruction after the event – trial court's findings of fact - not lightly disregarded – diagnosis and treatment of child presenting with head injury – instructions on discharge.

Reported

Delict – medical negligence – damages – liability in respect of a minor born with brain damage who now suffers from cerebral palsy – whether hospital staff negligent – if so, whether such negligence caused the damage – negligence and causation established – MEC liable

Act
6
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Business, Trade and Industry · Human Rights
Health and Food Safety
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Finance and Money

Documents citing this one 14

Judgment
14

Criminal law and Procedure – reliance on single witness – whether the court applied the cautionary rule in respect of single witness –admission of hearsay evidence – section 3 of the Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988 – admissibility of the photo identification in terms of s 37 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 – circumstances where no rules of identification parade applicable – evidential value of statement made in terms of s 115 – whether the appellant’s alibi is reasonably possibly true

 

Evidence – statement by party that opponent’s expert opinion can be handed in as evidence – not a ‘fact admitted’ on the record of proceedings within the meaning of s 15 of the Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965 – decision on expert evidence for the court – party cannot bind court to opinion of opponent’s expert – court entitled to make findings contrary to opinions of experts.

Delict – medical negligence – delay in transferring a patient to definitive care – whether medical practitioner’s conduct was negligent – whether negligence was causally linked to the amputation of the patient’s leg.

The hospital's negligent monitoring during labor caused a child's cerebral palsy, holding the defendant liable for damages.
Medical Negligence – Cerebral Palsy – Hospital's duty of care – Fetal distress and monitoring – Failure to intervene