Post Office Retirement Fund v South African Post Office SOC Ltd and Others (1134/2020) [2021] ZASCA 186 (30 December 2021)

Post Office Retirement Fund v South African Post Office SOC Ltd and Others (1134/2020) [2021] ZASCA 186 (30 December 2021)

Loading PDF...

This document is 622.2 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 13

Judgment
7
Reported
Reported

Contract – approach to interpretation – good faith – consent as
a requirement for the sale of shares – past conduct as a guide to
interpretation – parol evidence rule – good faith at common law –
independent source of contractual obligation – orders requiring the grant
of consent.

Reported
Reported
Reported

Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002 (DMA) – decisions and regulations
made during state of national disaster under the DMA – policy decisions of the National
Coronavirus Command Council, a cabinet committee comprising of the entire cabinet,
not justiciable because they had no legal effect – regulations made in terms of the
DMA (the level 4 regulations) made in a procedurally fair manner, alternatively in a
rational decision-making process – Minister of Co-operative Governance and
Traditional Affairs applied her mind to representations received from members of the
public – with two exceptions, the level 4 regulations found to be reasonable and
justifiable limitations of fundamental rights – reg 16(2)(f), which permitted only limited
forms of exercise during the level 4 lockdown, and items 1 and 2 of Part E of Table 1,
read with reg 28(3), which prohibited the over-the-counter sale of hot food, declared
to be invalid to the extent of their conflict with the Constitution – challenge to directions
made by the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition moot.

 

National Credit Act 34 of 2005 – section 141(1)(b) – power of
National Consumer Tribunal to grant leave to refer a complaint directly to it
when National Credit Regulator has issued a notice of non-referral – nature of
proceeding – section does not require formal application nor public hearing –
factors to be considered by Tribunal – Tribunal has wide discretion – decision
to grant leave to refer directly not appealable in terms of section 148(2)

Act
6
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Finance and Money
Finance and Money
Business, Trade and Industry
Communications and Media
Business, Trade and Industry · Communications and Media · Finance and Money · Public administration

Documents citing this one 3

Judgment
3

Electricity Regulation Act 4 of 2006 – interdict and counter-application – municipality’s obligation to pay for electricity supplied to it by Eskom – interdict to prevent the interruption of the electricity supply for non-payment – counter-application to compel payment as agreed to by the municipality.

Whether the applicant is entitled to payment of retirement fund contributions in terms of section 13A of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 from the first respondent – whether the second to fifth respondents are personally liable for the first respondent’s arrear contributions and interest in terms of ss 13A(8) and 13A(9) of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956