- Flynote
-
Evidence–Onus of proof- whether the appellant failed to establish on a
balance of probabilities that the insured driver negligently caused the collision –
whether the trial court erred in not accepting the appellant’s version concerning the
point of impact – whether credibility findings ought to have been made against the
driver of the insured vehicle
Loading PDF...
This document is 615.7 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 4
Judgment 3
- S T v C T (1224 of 2016) [2018] ZASCA 73 (30 May 2018)
- Santam Bpk v Biddulph (105/2003) [2004] ZASCA 11 (23 March 2004)
- Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Group Ltd and Another v Martell & Cie SA and Others (427/2001) [2002] ZASCA 98 (6 September 2002)