|
Reported
The court upheld the Public Protector’s findings that diversion of ECDC funds and defective procurement were unlawful and dismissed the review application.
Public Protector – review – principle of legality v PAJA; PFMA s 43 and Treasury Regulations – virement and limits; Procurement – compliance with s 217 Constitution, PFMA and Treasury Regulations; Irregular transfers to personal accounts – maladministration; Irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure by public entities.
|