|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| October 2024 |
|
|
Defendant liable where its insured entered an intersection against a red light; plaintiff not contributorily negligent.
Road Accident Fund claim — liability under s17(1) RAF Act — whether insured driver entered intersection against red light and failed to keep proper lookout — assessment of conflicting witness accounts and eyewitness corroboration — contributory negligence (Apportionment of Damages).
|
31 October 2024 |
|
A s424(1) claim must plead sufficient facts of participation, knowledge and causation; vague conclusions are excipiable.
Companies Act s424(1) – personal liability for reckless or fraudulent carrying on of company business – pleading standards – plead material facts of participation, knowledge and causation; pleadings stating conclusions (e.g. "recklessness", "misrepresentation") without supporting particulars are vague and excipiable; deficiencies should be cured by amendment, not by evidence or discovery.
|
22 October 2024 |
|
Rescission granted where third‑party joinder was procedurally defective and judgment was erroneously granted in absence.
Civil procedure – rescission (rule 42(1)(a)) – erroneous grant where party not procedurally entitled to judgment; Third‑party joinder (rule 13) – consortium is not a juristic person; individual members must be cited; Scope of relief under rule 13 – generally declaratory/apportionment, monetary/joint and several orders inappropriate in absence of legal basis; Default and wilful default – reasonable explanation can justify rescission; Costs – award of scale C for rescission applicant and wasted costs on scale B.
|
17 October 2024 |
|
A motion alleging environmental nuisance from manganese was referred to trial due to material, foreseeable disputes of fact.
Environmental law / nuisance – alleged pollution and dust from stockpiled manganese; potential health and ecological harm. Civil procedure – referral to trial under Uniform Rule 6(5)(e) and 6(5)(g) where material disputes of fact exist. Foreseeability test – whether disputes of fact were reasonably foreseeable when instituting motion proceedings. Costs – applicants ordered to pay specified respondents’ costs on scale C; experts’ qualifying fees reserved for trial.
|
15 October 2024 |
|
Court found First Respondent complied with disclosure order, discharged that paragraph and awarded costs against respondents.
Civil procedure – urgent application – interim rule nisi – disclosure of bank accounts and deposits – compliance with interim order. Civil procedure – condonation of late filing of answering affidavit – delay explained and condoned. Contempt – allegations not properly pleaded in answering/ replying affidavit – application for contempt must be brought on notice. Relief not sought in notice of motion – further and/or alternative relief must be pleaded and supported on the papers. Costs – respondents ordered to pay applicant’s costs (not punitive).
|
8 October 2024 |
|
Particulars seeking access to company‑owned property were vague, failed to disclose a cause of action, and exceptions were upheld.
Pleadings – exception under Rule 23(1) – particulars of claim vague and embarrassing – failure to disclose cause of action; Agreement partly oral/partly written – lack of particularity and inconsistent annexures; Alienation of Land Act/formalities for interests in land and executory donations; Director’s authority to bind company insufficiently pleaded; Relief vague and uncertain (unspecified beneficiaries, indeterminate periods).
|
8 October 2024 |
|
Judgment awards R5,243,568 (after interim payment) for loss of earnings following permanent leg injuries; actuarial Scenario 2 accepted.
• Damages – loss of earning capacity – quantification by actuarial calculation based on joint expert minutes – contingency deductions applied. • Medical evidence – joint orthopaedic, occupational therapy and industrial psychology minutes accepted on permanent impairment and restricted capacity. • Actuarial scenarios – court preference for scenario assuming nil injured future earnings where supported by evidence. • Costs – defendant liable for taxed or agreed costs including specified expert fees and two counsel where employed.
|
8 October 2024 |
|
Failure to plead essential contractual "milestones" rendered the particulars vague and embarrassing, requiring amendment within 15 days.
Exception – vagueness and embarrassment – high threshold; must show vagueness and serious prejudice – pleadings read holistically; Rule 18(6) – contracts must state if written or oral and annex written portion; Rule 23 v Rule 30A – distinction between vagueness striking at cause of action and mere lack of particularity; Contractual milestones – failure to plead essential terms may render pleading excipiable.
|
1 October 2024 |
| September 2024 |
|
|
Warrantless search and seizure of a correctional official’s phones without consent or National Commissioner authorisation was unlawful; spoliation granted.
Correctional Services Act s101(2) — peremptory prohibition on searching a correctional official or seizing property without consent or National Commissioner authorisation; mandament van spolie — available against state organs; public power and doctrine of legality; urgency and condonation; unlawful seizure null and void.
|
19 September 2024 |
|
Court postponed provisional liquidation, ordered comprehensive opposing affidavit and de bonis propriis costs against withdrawing attorney.
Company law – provisional liquidation – urgency – court found no exceptional urgency beyond alleged criminal conduct; Representation – a director who is not a legal practitioner generally may not represent a company in court except in very exceptional circumstances; Civil procedure – attorney’s withdrawal not in accordance with Rules of Court – costs de bonis propriis ordered; Procedural fairness – respondent ordered to file comprehensive opposing affidavit with specified timetable.
|
18 September 2024 |
|
High Court dismisses urgent parenting/contact application because extant children’s court orders and lis alibi pendens bar relief.
Family law – Urgent High Court application for primary care/contact – Effect and binding force of existing children’s court orders – Doctrine of lis alibi pendens – Necessity of family advocate’s report to determine best interests of the child – Forum shopping and obedience to court orders (s 165(5) Constitution).
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Court-ordered business rescue commences on the s 131 court order; ‘creditor’ may include contractual delivery rights, limiting intervention to affected persons.
Companies Act — s 131 business rescue: commencement occurs on court order placing company under supervision; application initiates process but does not itself commence proceedings; business rescue practitioner and supervisory regime operate post-order. Participation — only ‘affected persons’ (creditors, shareholders, employees) at commencement may participate; former creditors excluded. ‘Creditor’ — includes non-monetary and future/contingent contractual rights (e.g. packrights) for participation purposes. Intervention — Uniform Rule 12 and general intervention principles do not displace Act’s tailored participation regime.
|
17 September 2024 |
|
Court grants interim maintenance and reduced legal-costs contribution; condonation granted and voluminous pleadings criticised.
Family law – Rule 43 interlocutory relief pending divorce – condonation for late sworn reply; abuse of process and prolix pleadings; interim maintenance for minor children; payment of school fees and medical aid; refusal to order replacement vehicle; contribution to legal costs reduced as excessive; costs each party own.
|
3 September 2024 |
|
A monetary transfer used to buy registered property vested inter vivos, not a donatio mortis causa, so repayment claim dismissed.
Donatio mortis causa v donatio inter vivos – vesting test to determine pactum successorium; presumption in favour of inter vivos donation; testamentary formalities required for donatio mortis causa; revocation and enforceability where donation vested inter vivos.
|
3 September 2024 |
| August 2024 |
|
|
Leave to appeal was granted on whether a damages claim against attorneys was prescribed, turning on the timing of knowledge.
Prescription – commencement of prescription – professional negligence – knowledge of facts necessary for claim – interpretation of communications between attorney and client – leave to appeal – reasonable possibility another court may differ.
|
29 August 2024 |
|
SARS lawfully recovered pension funds via a s 179 TAA third‑party notice; PFA s 37A does not bar such recovery.
Tax law – Tax Administration Act s 179 – third‑party appointment/IT88 – pay‑now‑argue‑later enforcement of tax debts Pension funds – Pension Funds Act s 37A – interaction with later TAA provisions; implied override by later statute Constitutional law – right of access to social security (s 27) – reasonable and justifiable limitation by tax recovery measures Civil procedure – condonation for late filing – test applied and granted
|
27 August 2024 |
|
An interim arbitration measure does not attract statutory post-award interest where contract expressly excludes interest on adjudication amounts.
Arbitration and interest – Interim measures do not constitute awards under s29 Arbitration Act; Interest Act inapplicable absent judgment/award; Contractual no-interest clause binds adjudication amounts; Civil procedure – amendment incompetent where court order has defined issues; lis pendens and arbitration process limit court intervention.
|
20 August 2024 |
|
Condonation granted for late statutory notice: good cause and minimal prejudice, despite uncertain prospects.
Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40/2002 — s3(2)(a), s3(4): condonation for late statutory notice; requirements of prescription, good cause and unreasonable prejudice; assessment of prospects of success; weight of applicant’s bona fides and explanation; litigation costs by organ of state insufficient to show unreasonable prejudice.
|
20 August 2024 |
|
An estate representative may enforce a valid written deed of sale against a purchaser; payment must be made to the estate under estate administration rules.
• Property law – Alienation of Land Act s 2(1) – written deed of sale for land signed by parties is required and enforceable. • Succession/estate administration – letters of authority under Administration of Estates Act empower the estate representative to claim monies due to the estate and require payment into estate accounts. • Contract interpretation – peremptory written terms (entire agreement clause) bind parties; extrinsic, unattested statements cannot vary the deed. • Civil procedure – where no real dispute of fact exists, monetary claims under admitted written contracts may be pursued by motion.
|
20 August 2024 |
|
A plaintiff is entitled to have legal representation present during Rule 36 psychological and psychiatric assessments.
Rule 36(1) – medical examinations for damages – entitlement to legal representation at forensic psychological and psychiatric assessments; application of Goldberg; admissibility and protection of audio‑visual recordings; constitutional rights to bodily and psychological integrity; costs order including two counsel and expert costs.
|
13 August 2024 |
| July 2024 |
|
|
Bail refused due to lack of exceptional circumstances under section 60(11)(a) CPA for a serious crimes defendant.
Criminal Procedure – Bail application in serious offenses – Exceptional circumstances under section 60(11)(a) of CPA – Flight risk and obstruction of justice concerns.
|
30 July 2024 |
|
Execution of a primary residence refused under Rule 46A because sale would infringe the debtor's section 26(1) housing right.
Rule 46A – execution against primary residence – protection of section 26(1) right to adequate housing; factors to be weighed include primary residence status, circumstances of incurring debt, payment history, outstanding mortgage, and proportionality of prejudice; subsequent payments and debtor’s employment relevant to resisting execution.
|
9 July 2024 |
| June 2024 |
|
|
Life sentences imposed for two rapes by a parental figure; mitigating factors insufficient to establish substantial and compelling circumstances.
Criminal law – Minimum sentencing – Section 51(1) Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act – Rape of child and repeat offences attract mandatory life unless substantial and compelling circumstances established; factors: abuse of trust, victim impact, remorse, personal circumstances, proportionality.
|
28 June 2024 |
|
Regional Council entitled to spoliation relief after coerced dispossession; Rule Nisi confirmed and costs awarded.
Property/Spoliation — mandament van spolie — requirement of peaceful and undisturbed possession; voluntary surrender versus coerced dispossession. Locus standi — Regional Council’s authority to act for a debilitated local church under the UCCSA constitution. Procedure — condonation/filing of affidavits through registrar without leave; postponement as discretionary indulgence; refusal where tactical delay suspected. Relief — confirmation of Rule Nisi and costs on scale A.
|
25 June 2024 |
|
Conviction for assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm set aside; substituted with common assault and an appropriate suspended fine.
Criminal law – Assault – Distinction between common assault and assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm; requirement to prove or admit intent to do grievous bodily harm; competent verdict under s 266(a) Criminal Procedure Act; review and substitution of conviction and sentence; sentencing principles and suspension of sentence.
|
25 June 2024 |
|
Court set aside immigration decisions and remitted them for reconsideration; declined substitution absent exceptional circumstances.
Administrative law — PAJA s 8(1)(c)(ii) — substitution versus remittal of administrative action — ‘exceptional circumstances’, ‘foregone conclusion’, and ‘in as good a position’ tests — separation of powers and deference to administrators — immigration decisions and internal review — remittal with directions and timeframes — costs awarded to successful applicant.
|
11 June 2024 |
| May 2024 |
|
|
Court awards damages for plaintiff's blindness due to negligence in handling original claims for compensation.
Damages - determination of general damages for blindness - negligent handling of claims by law firms - award balanced against current standards and precedents.
|
23 May 2024 |
|
Claims against an organ of state dismissed: earlier claims prescribed and no statutory ILPACOSA notice or condonation provided.
Prescription – s 11(d) Prescription Act – delictual claims arising 5 September 2016 prescribed where summons served after three years; prescription not subject to judicial condonation. Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act – s 3(1)–(2) notice requirement is peremptory/jurisdictional; failure to serve notice and failure to apply for condonation under s 3(4) renders proceedings unenforceable. Pleadings – replication required to meet special plea; absent replication evidence of compliance is irrelevant and inadmissible.
|
16 May 2024 |
|
Divorce-derived personal right to transfer precedes creditor's claim; registration required before property becomes executable.
Property law; transfer of immovable property requires registration (s16 Deeds Registries Act); deed of settlement in divorce creates a personal right to compel transfer; section 45bis endorsement; creditor's subsequent judgment cannot defeat pre-existing personal right to transfer.
|
14 May 2024 |
|
Review of magistrate’s protection order dismissed for lack of gross irregularity; appeal was the proper remedy.
Domestic Violence Act — protection order granted in absentia — wilful absence — review v appeal — requirement to establish gross irregularity and prejudice on review — judicial bias allegation rejected — costs: ordinary scale.
|
14 May 2024 |
| April 2024 |
|
|
The plaintiff, struck by an unidentified vehicle, proved negligence and causation; the defendant held liable for 100% of proven damages.
Road Accident Fund liability – pedestrian struck by unidentified vehicle – proof of negligence and causation at merits stage – admissibility and weight of medico‑legal evidence – amendments to particulars – failure by defendant to advance a version or prove contributory negligence – costs order including expert and inspection costs.
|
30 April 2024 |
|
The applicant’s arrest and detention were lawful based on reasonable suspicion from credible eyewitness identification.
Arrest without warrant — reasonable suspicion — eyewitness identification and pointing out; Exercise of discretion to arrest — objective rationality; Lawful detention pre-appearance (s39(3) CPA); Post-appearance remand — prosecutor’s duty to place fair and honest facts before court; No liability for unlawful arrest or detention where suspicion and remand are objectively justified; Costs including wasted costs.
|
30 April 2024 |
|
Commercial inconvenience did not establish urgency; eviction application struck from the roll with costs.
Urgency — Rule 6(12) — applicant must set out explicit circumstances showing inability to obtain substantial redress in due course; commercial prejudice may justify urgency but must be convincingly pleaded; contractual clause allowing delayed occupation (clause 3.3) negates claim of irreparable prejudice; abridgement of time must respect prejudice to respondent and other litigants.
|
24 April 2024 |
|
Court orders additional admiralty security for a crystallised bunker claim and upholds urgent procedure and jurisdiction.
Admiralty — increased security under s 5(2)(d) — jurisdiction where arrest and security previously granted — urgent procedure under Practice Rule 12 — prima facie claim and genuine/ reasonable need for security — security for foreign arbitration claims — quantum for top-up security.
|
23 April 2024 |
|
Vehicle used to transport stolen goods declared forfeited under POCA; owner failed to establish innocent-owner defence.
POCA Chapter 6 – civil forfeiture of instrumentalities – not conviction-based; focus on property’s functional role. Instrumentality – must play a reasonably direct, substantial and meaningful role in the commission of the offence (Prophet factors). Innocent/ignorant owner defence – owner must show lack of knowledge or reasonable suspicion; state bears balance of probabilities. Proportionality enquiry (Mohunram/Prophet) – weigh effects on owner against societal purposes of forfeiture.
|
23 April 2024 |
|
Failure to set out clear grounds and explain default renders leave-to-appeal application fatally defective; upliftment premature without Rule 27(1) compliance.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal – Rule 49(1) peremptory requirement that grounds be set out clearly and succinctly – non-compliance renders application fatally defective/nullity. Civil procedure – default and upliftment of bar – requirement to give full and reasonable explanation covering entire delay; reckless or intentional disregard of rules may defeat upliftment. Civil procedure – Rule 27(1) – agreement to uplift the bar must be sought before application; failure renders upliftment premature. Condonation – discretion to condone late filing despite lack of good cause; indulgence may attract costs against the applicant.
|
17 April 2024 |
|
Arrest after voluntary interview was lawful: reasonable suspicion existed, discretion properly exercised, and detention justified.
Criminal procedure – arrest without warrant – s 40(1)(b) CPA – reasonable suspicion must be objective, based on specific and articulable facts. Arresting discretion – must be bona fide, rational and non-arbitrary; seriousness of scheduled offences relevant. Detention pending first appearance – release limited where scheduled/serious offences suspected. Appeal – reluctance to disturb trial court factual findings absent misdirection; appellate inference-drawing where appropriate.
|
16 April 2024 |
|
Applicants who withdrew their post-set-down applications were ordered to pay wasted costs; punitive costs were refused.
Civil procedure – withdrawal after set-down (Rule 41(1)) – withdrawing litigant ordinarily liable for costs – exceptional circumstances required to deny costs – Biowatch principle inapplicable where constitutional challenge not pleaded – attorney-and-client costs reserved for clearly vexatious or reprehensible conduct.
|
11 April 2024 |
|
Leave to appeal against validation of a customary marriage under s3(1)(b) lacked prospects; appeal dismissed with costs.
Customary marriage — s 3(1)(b) requirements (consent, lobola negotiation/acceptance, celebration) — emissaries and utsiki — living customary law; Leave to appeal — Superior Courts Act s 17(1) heightened threshold; Condonation and costs — costs follow results.
|
9 April 2024 |
|
Whether the appellant lawfully arrested and detained the respondents under s40(1)(b); court found unlawful, awarded R50,000 each.
Criminal procedure – Arrest without warrant – s 40(1)(b) CPA – reasonable suspicion must rest on solid grounds; reliance on undisclosed informant insufficient where particulars not verified; Detention – s 50 CPA – continued detention unlawful once investigating officer finds no link; Quantum – solatium for unlawful arrest/detention assessed by duration, circumstances, conduct of police and cell conditions; costs of appeal awarded to successful respondents.
|
9 April 2024 |
|
An urgent application established that the Fund unlawfully refused to accept or acknowledge claim lodgements, risking prescription.
Administrative law – statutory body’s power to receive claims – s 24(1)(b) RAF Act – requirement to accept delivery and acknowledge receipt; no power to refuse acceptance. Civil procedure – urgency – Rule 6(12) – risk of prescription and absence of substantial redress. Road Accident Fund – RAF1 form and Board Notice 271 of 2022 – substantial compliance principle; Board Notice and 2022 RAF1 declared unlawful by Full Bench.
|
9 April 2024 |
|
A municipal-entity board unlawfully appointed an unqualified CEO; the appointment was reviewed and set aside.
• Administrative law – PAJA review – appointment of municipal-entity CEO – unlawfulness where appointee lacks prescribed competencies; • Local government – Systems Act – board’s exclusive power to appoint municipal-entity CEO (s 93J) and limits on application of senior-manager appointment regulations; • Municipal Finance Management Act – competency regulations require accounting officers to meet minimum financial and supply-chain unit standards; • Interpretation – scope of appointment regulations vs competency regulations; • Remedies – review and setting aside of appointment where decision materially influenced by error of law, irrational and procedurally defective.
|
9 April 2024 |
|
Review dismissed: condonation refused and matter barred by res judicata; no declaration of headmanship granted.
• Administrative law – condonation for late review – full explanation for delay required; attorney negligence insufficient without adequate personal steps by litigant. • Res judicata/issue estoppel – prior final judgment between same parties on same subject matter bars relitigation. • Traditional leadership – review of recognition and incumbency of headmanship; requirement of identification by legitimate royal family. • Remedies – declaratory relief cannot be granted absent consequential relief setting aside existing recognition.
|
9 April 2024 |
| March 2024 |
|
|
The court found that the parties' marriage was valid under customary law, not affected by civil marriage intentions.
Family law – Customary marriage – Validity of marriage under Recognition of Customary Marriages Act – Requirement of mutual consent.
|
26 March 2024 |
|
Court ordered disclosure of forensic report under PAIA, finding respondent failed to prove confidentiality or private-body status.
Promotion of Access to Information Act – application for forensic report – whether record excluded by s7 where related proceedings concluded; Public v private body – whether State-owned company acted as public or private body when commissioning internal forensic report; PAIA thresholds – s11 (public body) v s50 (private body) and onus on requester; Grounds of refusal – mandatory breach-of-confidence exemption (s37/s65) requires evidentiary proof beyond mere confidentiality clause; Section 80(1) – judicial peek discretionary and unnecessary where holder fails to discharge onus.
|
22 March 2024 |
|
High Court appointed an independent curator ad litem and postponed parental-rights application pending best-interest reports.
Children’s Act – appointment of curator ad litem – investigation of best interests – Family Advocate to assist and report – overlap with Children’s Court appointment – postponement sine die; parties granted leave to supplement affidavits.
|
19 March 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to exhaust PAJA internal remedies and did not bring a timely review; application dismissed with costs.
Administrative law; PAJA s7(1)–(2) — duty to exhaust internal remedies; leave to appeal under FAIS; unreasonable delay and condonation; no exceptional circumstances for exemption; review and execution challenged but dismissed.
|
19 March 2024 |
|
Board not lawfully removed; court orders immediate payment under Service Delivery Agreement and confirms directors’ locus standi.
Municipal entities – removal of directors; interplay between Systems Act s 93G and Companies Act s 71; contractual default under Service Delivery Agreement; arbitration clause and court jurisdiction; joinder and necessary parties; urgency and locus standi.
|
19 March 2024 |
|
Court awarded damages for past and future income loss after accepting expert evidence and applying contingency deductions including reduced life expectancy.
Road Accident Fund – catastrophic amputation – assessment of past loss of income and future loss of earning capacity; reliance on admitted expert reports and actuarial certificate; pre-morbid earnings as basis for actuarial calculation; contingency deductions including diminished life expectancy; separation of past medical expenses (Rule 33(4)); costs including two counsel.
|
18 March 2024 |
|
Accused convicted of murder, attempted murder and firearm possession; POCA and certain counts not proven.
Criminal law – identification evidence and proof beyond reasonable doubt; alibi disclosed late – probative weight and adverse inferences; common purpose liability where co‑accused present, armed and associated with conduct; POCA ss 9(1)(a) and 9(2)(a) require subjective intent to promote a pattern of gang activity; duplication of firearm possession counts and failure of s220 admissions to establish a count.
|
7 March 2024 |