profile image

Labour Court of South Africa, Johannesburg

The Labour Court has the same status as a high court. The Labour Court adjudicates matters relating to labour disputes. Appeals are made to the Labour Appeal Court.

Physical address
86 Juta Street, Arbour Square Building, 6th and 7th Floors, Corner Juta and Melle Streets, Braamfontein 2001
11 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
11 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
January 2012
Retrenchment for operational requirements found procedurally and substantively fair; selection criteria held objective.
Labour law – retrenchment – section 189 LRA – meaningful consultation and joint consensus-seeking process; selection criteria – chargeable utilisation and market demand – objective vs performance-based; substantive fairness – operational requirements and business justification; mitigation and redeployment; discretion on costs under s162 LRA.
25 January 2012
Reported
Persistent refusal to obey a lawful transfer instruction and failure to perform duties justified dismissal; review dismissed.
Labour law – review of arbitration award – insubordination for failure to obey transfer instruction – lawfulness and reasonableness of instruction – dismissal as appropriate sanction; record reconstruction and adequacy; disciplinary procedure and legal representation under collective agreement.
25 January 2012
Reported
Whether condonation for a late review and whether an arbitration award upholding dismissal for dishonesty and intimidation were reasonable.
Labour law – condonation for late review applications; review standard for arbitration awards (Sidumo) – reasonableness; evaluation and weight of expert handwriting evidence; circumstantial and direct evidence; dishonesty and intimidation as grounds for dismissal; appropriateness of dismissal as sanction.
20 January 2012
Reported
Late review dismissed; arbitration award upheld because employer failed to present essential evidence at arbitration.
Labour law – review of arbitration award – condonation for late review – necessity of satisfactory explanation and prospects of success; arbitration de novo – employer’s onus to prove poor performance on balance of probabilities; inadmissibility of fresh evidence on review where omitted at arbitration; section 144 rescission not a rehearing mechanism for parties’ evidential omissions.
20 January 2012
Reported
Arbitrator misapplied promotion policy and ignored material evidence; no unfair labour practice found, award set aside.
Labour law – Review of arbitration award – gross irregularity and failure to apply mind – interpretation and application of promotion policy (National Instruction 1/2004) – promotion disputes – employment equity not determinative – Court may substitute award where record permits.
20 January 2012
Review dismissed: dismissal for unauthorised absence and failure to comply with notification rule was reasonably upheld.
Labour law – review of arbitration award – whether dismissal for unauthorised absence and failure to follow notification rules was substantively fair – assessment of reasonableness of commissioner’s decision and consideration of medical evidence.
20 January 2012
Reported
An objection to con-arb prevents immediate arbitration; proceeding despite such objection and refusing a short stand-down was a gross irregularity.
Labour law – con-arb under section 191(5A) – objection to con-arb precludes immediate arbitration; objection itself suffices to stultify con-arb. Administrative law – review – gross irregularity – proceeding despite valid objection and unreasonable refusal to stand matter down. Arbitration practice – commissioner’s discretion to continue or adjourn under section 138(5) applies in con-arb context.
19 January 2012
Refusal to condone a late promotion dispute referral upheld due to vague excuse and weak prospects of success.
Labour law – condonation of late referral to bargaining council – factors: degree of lateness, reasons, prospects of success, balance of convenience/prejudice – requirement that unions signatory to dispute procedures be vigilant – inadequate/explained delay may warrant refusal without detailed merits inquiry.
19 January 2012
Whether a commissioner may set aside a dismissal by finding a charge defective despite the charge being sufficiently clear.
Labour law – dismissal for misconduct – clarity of charge – disciplinary charge sufficiently clear to enable defence; arbitration review – commissioner must weigh evidence and assess witness reliability; speculative findings and re-characterisation of charges amount to gross irregularity warranting setting aside award.
19 January 2012
Arbitrator’s substantive decision reasonable, but procedural unfairness due to burden-shifting; two months’ compensation awarded.
Labour law – review of CCMA arbitration award – Sidumo reasonableness standard – whether award a decision a reasonable commissioner could reach. Dismissal – substantive fairness – evidence, credibility and dishonesty as basis for dismissal. Dismissal – procedural fairness – onus under sections 188 and 192 of the LRA; improper burden-shifting by commissioner. Remedy – Labour Court’s power to substitute arbitration awards where material permits; compensation for procedurally unfair dismissal.
13 January 2012
Reported
Arbitrator's wrong statutory interpretation and reliance on an unpleaded entrapment defence vitiated the award; dismissal held fair.
Labour law – Review of arbitration award – Gross irregularity – Failure to resolve conflicting versions and to apply credibility/probabilities test; Misapplication of statutory definition of corruption (used dictionary instead); Reliance on unpleaded defence (entrapment) – Award set aside and substituted.
6 January 2012