profile image

Labour Court of South Africa, Port Elizabeth

The Labour Court has the same status as a high court. The Labour Court adjudicates matters relating to labour disputes. Appeals are made to the Labour Appeal Court.

Physical address
Bird street 2, Central Port Elizabeth, Port Elizabeth, 6001
13 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
13 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2014
Reported
An employer consulting the required collective body need not separately consult individual employees; termination was lawful.
Labour law – Section 189(1) hierarchy – consultation with bodies under collective agreements displaces obligation to consult individual employees; locus standi under s189A(13); facilitation under s189A(4) may be by agreement; effect of s189A(7) time limits on lawful termination.
5 December 2014
September 2014
Arbitrator misapplied consistency principle and wrongly characterized gross negligence as mere negligence; dismissal remitted for reconsideration.
Labour law — Review of arbitration award — Gross negligence standard — Distinction between severity of misconduct and intolerability of employment relationship — Consistency in sanctions — Erroneous comparator based on procedural flaw — Remittal for reconsideration of sanction.
3 September 2014
A CCMA s142A settlement providing reinstatement was validly made an arbitration award despite a later signed fixed-term contract.
Labour law – s142A settlement agreements – enforcement as arbitration awards; review grounds – tribunal reliance on extraneous recollection; contractual interpretation and rectification; role of subsequent conduct; waiver/election defence reserved.
3 September 2014
August 2014
12 August 2014
Labour Court may intervene to protect an employee's right to be heard when a commissioner refuses to re-open a case.
Labour law – CCMA arbitration – intervention in uncompleted arbitrations – exceptional circumstances permitting Labour Court relief to prevent denial of right to be heard. Administrative fairness – commissioner’s duty under s138 LRA to determine disputes fairly; right to be heard. Remedies – limits of s144 rescission and review as alternative remedies where party was present but denied opportunity to present evidence. Costs – employer ordered to pay costs for opposing unnecessary litigation.
12 August 2014
Court intervened in an uncompleted disciplinary enquiry where the chairperson acted ultra vires and awarded costs to the applicant.
Labour law – interim relief to stay disciplinary enquiry; jurisdiction to intervene in uncompleted disciplinary proceedings in exceptional cases; ultra vires findings by chairperson; right to be heard (audi) and waiver; authority to represent juristic person; costs where applicant would have succeeded but for respondent's dismissal.
1 August 2014
May 2014
Reported
Award set aside where arbitrator failed to record proceedings, concealed conflict and breached duty to act impartially.

Labour law – arbitration – duty to conduct arbitration fairly (s138(1) LRA); failure to record proceedings – reviewability of award; duty to disclose conflicts of interest and to recuse; unreasonable award; adverse costs (attorney-and-client) for arbitrator and bargaining council.

27 May 2014
A letter of intent does not satisfy LRA s68(2); urgent interdict struck for inadequate notice and costs awarded against applicants.
Labour law – secondary strikes – s66 and s68(2) LRA – statutory "notice of the application" requires a notice of motion with supporting affidavits; letter of intent insufficient – requirements for shortening 48‑hour notice (written notice, reasonable opportunity to be heard, good cause) – condonation procedure required – costs awarded for non‑compliance.
21 May 2014
Court dismissed automatic-unfairness claims; referral to CCMA for ordinary unfair-dismissal arising from incapacity; costs shared.
Labour law – alleged automatically unfair dismissal – s 187(1)(d) (exercise of LRA rights) and s 187(1)(h) (protected disclosure under PDA) – causation test from Kroukam applied; incapacity dismissal – contested medical incapacity and Disability Management Committee procedures; jurisdiction – court may dismiss automatic-unfairness claim and refer ordinary unfair-dismissal disputes to CCMA; costs – each party to pay own.
16 May 2014
Reported
Failure to file a proper answering affidavit left the applicant's version unchallenged, but insufficient evidence on section 68 required oral evidence.
Labour law – strike – unprotected strike – claim for damages under section 68(1)(b) of the LRA – requirements for assessment of just and equitable compensation. Civil procedure – motion proceedings v action – material disputes of fact and when motion proceedings are inappropriate. Rescission/condonation – section 165 of the LRA – delay and unsatisfactory explanation. Evidence – adequacy of affidavit evidence to determine quantum; referral to oral evidence where factual basis is insufficient.
15 May 2014
April 2014
Applicant’s contractual damages claim dismissed for failure to plead or prove calculations and legal basis for claimed losses.
Employment law – Contractual damages – Claim for notice pay and other losses dismissed where amounts were baldly stated without factual or documentary substantiation; court may not engage in conjecture when assessing damages (SA Football Association v Mangope applied). Contract – notice provisions; proof of damages; legal basis for recovery of employer property.
29 April 2014
February 2014
An arbitrator’s refusal to decide issues in the parties’ agreed terms of reference is a gross irregularity making the award reviewable.
Arbitration — review under s33 Arbitration Act — agreement that award is final does not oust review — arbitrator must determine issues in parties’ agreed pleadings — failure to adjudicate issues within terms of reference is gross irregularity and excess of power — award reviewable and remitted.
7 February 2014
January 2014
Applicant failed to establish urgency; application struck from the roll and costs awarded to respondent.
Labour law — Urgent applications — Rule 8(2) requires explanation of urgency and non-compliance with rules; delay and self-created urgency defeat entitlement to urgent relief; internal disciplinary remedies should be exhausted before review; costs follow where urgency not established.
31 January 2014