Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

High Court of South Africa KwaZulu-Natal, Durban

The KwaZulu-Natal Division of the High Court of South Africa is a superior court of law with general jurisdiction over the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. The main seat of the division is at Pietermaritzburg, while a subordinate local seat at Durban has concurrent jurisdiction over the coastal region of the province.

1 judgment

Advanced search

Court registries

North Eastern Circuit

All years

All months

Filters

Sort by:

1 judgment

Citation	Judgment date
June 2012
Afonso NO and Another v Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs Inc and Others (13871/2011) [2012] ZAKZDHC 40 (29 June 2012) Where a statutory assessment falls within Rule 48’s ambit parties must follow Rule 48 or obtain full condonation; failure warranted dismissal. Administrative law – Review of professional body assessment – Applicability and mandatory use of Rule 48 where s 74(5) Attorneys Act applies. Civil procedure – Rule 48 procedure for taxation reviews – necessity of stated case, prescribed timetable, and condonation for non-compliance. Procedural law – Delay and condonation – requirements for satisfactory explanation and prospects of success before condonation granted. Costs – failed review dismissed with costs.	29 June 2012

Citation

Judgment date

June 2012

Afonso NO and Another v Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs Inc and Others (13871/2011) [2012] ZAKZDHC 40 (29 June 2012)

Where a statutory assessment falls within Rule 48’s ambit parties must follow Rule 48 or obtain full condonation; failure warranted dismissal.

Administrative law – Review of professional body assessment – Applicability and mandatory use of Rule 48 where s 74(5) Attorneys Act applies. Civil procedure – Rule 48 procedure for taxation reviews – necessity of stated case, prescribed timetable, and condonation for non-compliance. Procedural law – Delay and condonation – requirements for satisfactory explanation and prospects of success before condonation granted. Costs – failed review dismissed with costs.

29 June 2012