background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
6 judgments
  • Filters
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
6 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2008
Reported
The applicant’s 'wrongful life' delictual claim is contrary to public policy and is dismissed.
Delict – wrongful life – claim by child for being born with congenital defects due to medical failure to detect/inform – wrongfulness considered by reference to public policy and constitutional norms – distinction between parents’ ‘wrongful birth’ claims and child’s ‘wrongful life’ claim – courts should not adjudicate whether non-existence is preferable to life with disabilities.
3 June 2008
Reported
Failure to pursue statutory appeal or review bars a compensation claim under s 28 LUPO for excess road reserve.
Administrative law – LUPO s 28 (vesting of public streets) – entitlement to compensation where provision exceeds ‘normal need’ – interplay with s 42 rezoning conditions – availability of internal appeal (s 44) and judicial review as primary remedies – collateral challenge to unlawful rezoning condition – expropriation/confiscation.
2 June 2008
Reported
Council resolution to increase rates was lawful, but the publication notice failed statutory requirements and was invalid.
Local government — Property rates — s 10G(7) LGTA — Council may lawfully adopt rates where objections have been considered through prior consultation; formal debate at council not always required; Publication requirements — s 10G(7)(c) — notice must state operative date and allow statutory objection period; substantial compliance required; implementing rates before objection period expires invalidates notice and amounts to unlawful retrospective levy; National Treasury guideline percentages are advisory, non-dispositive.
2 June 2008
Reported
Court may order curatorship costs from investors' trust assets and restrict disinvestment and benefit payments under s 5 FI Act.
Financial Institutions (Protection of Funds) Act s 5 — curatorship powers — wide discretion under s 5(5)(b) and (f) — curator authorised to manage and investigate institution — trust assets remain beneficially owned by investors but enjoyment may be temporarily restricted — court may authorise curatorship costs to be defrayed pro rata from investor assets when institution funds insufficient — FSB funds not available to meet curatorship costs — court may restrict disinvestment and benefit payments during curatorship.
2 June 2008
The applicant’s negligent driving and not-credible version upheld; conviction confirmed.
Criminal law – culpable homicide – negligent driving causing fatal collision; credibility findings; inference of intoxication/lack of control from erratic driving and posture; appeal — no misdirection by trial court; brake-mark evidence held insufficient to support accused’s version.
2 June 2008
Reported
Unexplained acceptance of a single, potentially implicated witness justified appellate reassessment and substitution to accessory after the fact.
Criminal law — Appeal — Misleading judgment — Trial court accepting single State witness without reasons — misdirection permitting appellate reassessment; Single witness/accomplice rule — evidence of a potentially implicated witness must be treated with caution; Sufficiency of evidence — murder not proved beyond reasonable doubt, conviction substituted to accessory after the fact; Sentence — substitution to correctional supervision appropriate where facts and probation report before appellate court; Costs — State ordered to pay wasted costs on attorney-and-client scale for non-appearance.
2 June 2008