|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| April 2024 |
|
|
Reported
Section 27 of the Disaster Management Act is constitutional; it does not impermissibly delegate power or create a de facto emergency.
Constitutional law — Disaster Management Act s27 — delegation of legislative power — limits and safeguards (classification, consultation, purposes, duration, judicial review) — distinction between state of disaster and state of emergency — parliamentary oversight and accountability mechanisms (portfolio committees, Oversight and Accountability Model) — stare decisis (Esau; British American Tobacco; Nu Africa).
|
30 April 2024 |
|
Reported
Section 44(4), read with the FSR Act and regulations, authorises inspections of accredited brokers; s47 is not a prerequisite.
Medical Schemes Act s 44(4) – inspections and investigatory powers – "any person" includes accredited brokers when read with FSR Act Chapter 9 and relevant regulations; section 47 complaints procedure not a jurisdictional bar to s 44(4) inspections; investigative inspections are subject to limited review for legality, fairness and rationality.
|
30 April 2024 |
|
A court must not make orders prejudicing a non‑joined third party with a direct substantial interest; matter remitted for joinder.
Joinder – third parties with direct and substantial interests – courts must not make findings or grant relief prejudicial to non‑parties; Evictions (PIE) – where interrelated agreements give rise to registered rights (mortgage), mortgagee may have to be joined; Appellate court may raise non‑joinder mero motu and remit matter for joinder before adjudicating substantive relief; Declaratory relief cancelling transfers and bonds affects third‑party rights and requires joinder.
|
29 April 2024 |
|
A bidder’s mere statement of ISO certification did not meet a mandatory tender requirement; splitting the award was lawful under disclosed objective criteria.
Public procurement – tender conditions – mandatory returnable of ISO 3834 certificate – peremptory/material requirements cannot be satisfied by mere statements; condonation not permissible. Public procurement – splitting of tender awards – lawful where RFP disclosed intention to split and objective criteria (SHEQ, supplier development & localisation, financial analysis) applied in terms of s 2(1)(f) PPPFA and s 217 Constitution.
|
29 April 2024 |
|
Recognition by a familiar eyewitness in daylight upheld as reliable identification; sentencing discretion in imposing life sentences affirmed.
Criminal law – Identification of accused – Distinction between recognition of known persons and identification of strangers – Factors affecting reliability (lighting, proximity, opportunity to observe, prior acquaintance) – Single-witness identification may suffice; defects in identification-parade documentation not to be raised for first time on appeal – Sentencing discretion and minimum life sentences; absence of substantial and compelling circumstances.
|
26 April 2024 |
|
Guarantors’ liability arose only after the lender implemented the agreed facility increase; appeal dismissed with costs.
Contract interpretation – commercial guarantees – whether guarantors’ liability conditional upon lender increasing borrower’s facility as defined in guarantee. Definitions and 'Signature Date' – effect of clause making defined provisions substantive (clause 1.5). Exceptio non adimpleti contractus – lender’s prior performance as precondition to enforcement. First Amendment to Facilities Letter not effective to revive guarantee rendered inoperative by lender’s earlier refusal.
|
24 April 2024 |
|
Reported
The SCA reinstated a rape conviction, finding s 311 invocation competent and that non‑consent was proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – Rape – Consent to sexual penetration – Competence of invocation of s 311 Criminal Procedure Act – Sufficiency of evidence to prove absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt – Appellate review of factual findings and interference with trial court conviction.
|
24 April 2024 |
|
Reported
A creditor cannot rely on s 218(2) read with s 22(1) to sue directors personally; directors’ liability is prescribed by the Act.
Company law – Companies Act s 218(2) – statutory remedy for contraventions to be sourced in substantive provisions; s 22(1) regulates company conduct not directors directly; directors’ liability for reckless trading arises under s 77(3)(b) (claim by the company) – creditor claims against directors under s 218(2)/s 22(1) disallowed; separate juristic personality preserved.
|
24 April 2024 |
|
An order compelling further particulars in divorce proceedings is interlocutory and not appealable to the SCA.
Civil procedure – appealability – interlocutory orders – order compelling further particulars in matrimonial proceedings is interlocutory and not appealable to the SCA. Civil procedure – doctrine of finality – Zweni principle applies; ‘interests of justice’ cannot be used by courts other than Constitutional Court to expand appealability without justification. Appellate jurisdiction – duty of appellate courts to determine jurisdiction mero motu; failure to do so is fatal. Evidentiary practice in divorce actions – scope and precedential status of Rall v Rall questioned but not finally decided.
|
19 April 2024 |
|
Reported
Section 294 validly requires a commissioning parent’s gamete; no constitutional right to a genetically linked sibling.
Constitutional law — Children’s rights — Surrogacy — Interpretation of s 294 of the Children’s Act — Requirement of gamete of at least one commissioning parent — No constitutional right of an existing child to a genetically linked sibling — Reading-in inadmissible absent invalidity — Deference to legislative policy and binding precedent (AB).
|
19 April 2024 |
|
Whether exceptional circumstances justified s 17(2)(f) reconsideration and whether a court may make settlement orders binding non-consenting parties.
• Civil procedure – s 17(2)(f) Superior Courts Act – exceptional circumstances permitting reconsideration of a dismissed application for leave to appeal.
• Civil procedure – Settlement agreements – court must satisfy itself before making settlement an order in rem; cannot bind non-consenting parties without hearing them (Airports Co SA v Big Five; Buffalo City v Asla; Eke v Parsons).
• Constitutional procurement – s 217 – constitution of panel found inconsistent with s 217; remedial relief including suspension of invalidity until contracts complete.
• Review – orders that affect non-consenting parties are incompetent and may be set aside.
|
19 April 2024 |
|
Pre-trial concession binds parties; D2 invalid under NCA, but D1 enforceable for R5 million plus interest and costs.
Contract – specific performance – enforcement of written agreements – pre-trial concession binding – National Credit Act s 8 and s 40 – when an agreement constitutes a credit agreement – severability – inchoate, simulated or abandoned contracts.
|
19 April 2024 |
|
Reported
Jurisdiction is determined by the amount pleaded; s 37(2) allows magistrates to consider larger sums to decide a within‑limit claim.
Magistrates’ court jurisdiction – Magistrates’ Court Act s 29(1)(g) – jurisdiction determined by amount claimed in the pleadings; s 37(2) – court may consider matters beyond monetary jurisdiction when necessary to decide a claim within jurisdiction; apportionment/order reducing claimed amount does not oust jurisdiction; Jones v Williams distinguishable.
|
19 April 2024 |
|
Reported
An interim reconnection order compelling municipal electricity supply despite longstanding non-payment was appealable and unlawful.
Civil procedure – appealability of interim orders; Zweni triad and interests of justice; municipal law – municipal duty to provide services versus statutory credit-control and right to disconnect for non-payment; interdictory relief – requirements and availability of alternative remedies; sectional title governance and Body Corporate obligations.
|
18 April 2024 |
|
Death of the appellant’s minor child vests the claim in the estate; appellant lacks locus standi; emotional shock claim remitted.
Delict – medical negligence – causation; damages for emotional shock require detectable psychiatric injury; transmissibility of deceased minor’s damages only after litis contestatio; executor required to prosecute estate claims; remittal where lower court failed to decide lis; striking matter off roll pending appointment of executor.
|
18 April 2024 |
|
Convictions upheld; ambiguous, incoherent sentencing order required remittal to the high court for clarification.
Criminal procedure – s 309C petition – appeal from refusal of leave – threshold is reasonable prospects of success; single-witness identification and cautionary rule; sentencing orders must be clear and unambiguous; misdirected or incoherent sentence warrants remittal.
|
17 April 2024 |
|
Reported
A financial institution that pays out on a duly authorised client instruction did not owe a delictual duty to beneficiaries for the trustee’s subsequent theft.
Delict — pure economic loss — omission by financial institution; statutory duties under CISCA, Protection of Funds Act and Trust Property Control Act — whether those impose delictual duty to third‑party beneficiaries; negligence standards for managers acting on client instructions; factual and legal causation where loss follows client’s criminal misappropriation; remoteness and public policy constraints on imposing liability.
|
16 April 2024 |
|
Enforcement of acceleration and foreclosure clauses for non‑payment of municipal charges was lawful; special leave to appeal refused.
Contract – loan agreement and mortgage bond – obligation to pay municipal charges; Municipal law – Systems Act and municipal credit control by‑laws – payment of undisputed amounts and consolidation of accounts; Events of default – non‑payment permitting acceleration and foreclosure; Public policy – enforcement of contractual terms, pacta sunt servanda, and limits to refusing enforcement; Appeal procedure – special leave test: reasonable prospects and special circumstances.
|
15 April 2024 |
|
Reported
Licence-holders are directly affected and an appeal suspends the Controller’s grant of site and retail licences.
Administrative law; Petroleum Products Act s 12A(1) – standing to appeal – meaning of "directly affected"; objections vs appeals under licensing regulations; commercial interest and factual demonstration of prejudice; common-law presumption that an appeal suspends an administrative decision unless statute displaces it; appeal suspends Controller's grant of site and retail licences; remittal to trial court to determine interim interdict.
|
15 April 2024 |
|
Whether the purchaser waived a suspensive condition; court held no waiver and dismissed leave to appeal.
Contract — suspensive condition — waiver — onus and presumption against waiver; agent’s authority to waive; formalities for waiver (written and signed); agreement lapsing on non-fulfilment; cession of claim to deposit; leave to appeal — reasonable prospects under s 17 Superior Courts Act.
|
12 April 2024 |
|
Reported
Statutory housing schemes govern enforcement of spatial and housing obligations; WCLAA procedures lawful and Sea Point not a restructuring zone.
Constitutional subsidiarity; socio‑economic rights—housing and land—must be pursued via statutory schemes (Housing Act/Social Housing Act/SPLUMA); provincial disposal powers under WCLAA; regulation 4(6) construed to render signed agreement a 'proposed disposal' subject to notice-and-comment; GIAMA asset‑management requirements do not, by themselves, invalidate disposals; IGRFA requires cooperation but not mandatory consultation of national Minister for every provincial disposal; interpretation of restructuring‑zone notices governed by text and context, not municipal intent extrinsic evidence.
|
12 April 2024 |
|
SACE unlawfully fettered its discretion and denied learners and parents procedural and child‑centred rights in disciplinary sanctions.
Administrative law — PAJA s 7(1): clock begins when reasons for administrative action are known or ought to be known; Mootness — discretionary refusal where order will have practical effect; Administrative action — unlawful fettering of discretion by mandatory sanctions policy; Procedural fairness — right of child and parents to be meaningfully heard; Children's rights — best interests of the child paramount; Remedies — setting aside decisions and remitting for reconsideration with direction to consider rehabilitative sanctions.
|
8 April 2024 |
|
Condonation refused for lapsed appeal due to inordinate unexplained delay and no reasonable prospects of success.
Condonation; lapsed appeal; late filing of record and heads; inordinate/unexplained delay; prejudice to respondents; prospectless appeal founded on ex parte order against unnamed persons; State Attorney's non‑compliance with court rules.
|
8 April 2024 |
|
A South African court cannot adjudicate a s 361 eSwatini statutory claim against directors merely because they reside in South Africa.
Jurisdiction — Superior Courts Act and common-law limits; foreign statutory causes of action; extraterritoriality of foreign statutes; interpretation of “the court” in foreign insolvency provisions; residence insufficient alone to found jurisdiction; effectiveness principle versus territoriality.
|
8 April 2024 |
|
An ex parte interdict founded on material misstatements and mere classification fails absent proof of concrete national-security harm.
Interdicts — ex parte applications — duty of utmost good faith — full disclosure of material facts; material misstatements vitiate relief. Classified information — classification not conclusive; courts may scrutinise classified documents (Masetlha). National security — onus on State to prove concrete harm from disclosure; mere classification or public-domain overlap insufficient. Civil procedure — Schlesinger/Phillips principles govern rescission of ex parte orders obtained on incomplete/misleading facts.
|
5 April 2024 |
|
Plaintiff failed to prove warranty breach; expert affidavit admitted under Rule 38(2) lacked sufficient probative value.
Contract law – warranty of unchanged game numbers; burden of proof on plaintiff to prove breach; Civil procedure – Uniform Court Rule 38(2) – admission of affidavit evidence in lieu of oral testimony; Expert evidence – affidavit evidence that cannot be cross‑examined must be weighed for probative value against other evidence; Aerial game counts – methodological limitations and credibility issues; Plagiarism in expert affidavit undermining reliability.
|
5 April 2024 |
|
Respondent’s restitution claim succeeded under condictio indebiti; its mistake was reasonable despite the trust loan being void.
Unjust enrichment – condictio indebiti v condictio sine causa specialis – claimant need not elect but must prove pleaded condictio; Prescription – s 12(3) Prescription Act and knowledge by exercising reasonable care; Trust capacity – incapacity where trust deed minimum trustees not present; Reasonableness of mistake – reliance on trustees’ representations and conduct may make mistake excusable.
|
4 April 2024 |
|
Applicant failed to show special circumstances for special leave; appeal lacked prospects and was struck from the roll.
Procedure — Special leave to appeal under s 16(1)(b) Superior Courts Act requires an additional criterion beyond reasonable prospects; Sectional Titles Act — registration of sectional plan and opening of sectional title register can render restorative relief impossible; impossibility of performance; failure to amend pleadings and lack of prospects against subsequent purchasers.
|
4 April 2024 |
|
Amendment to add emotional shock damages permissible where liability finding addressed death, not causation of damages.
Civil procedure – Uniform Rule 33/stated case – separation of liability and quantum – necessity of clear orders delimiting issues; Pleadings – amendment to particulars of claim – adding general damages for emotional shock and medical costs after liability finding limited to death causation; Prejudice – right to investigate and lead expert evidence; Costs – no order where both parties failed to define issues clearly.
|
3 April 2024 |
|
Reported
Tacit consent to graze cannot be inferred without pleaded allegations and evidence of unequivocal conduct indicating agreement.
Extension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA) s 3(4) – occupier status; grazing rights do not derive from ESTA but from consent. Tacit agreement/consent – requirement of unequivocal conduct evidencing intention to contract; onus on party alleging tacit contract. Procedural fairness – court should not decide a case on an unpleaded basis or infer agreements without evidential foundation. Relief – removal and impoundment of livestock; interdict against returning livestock without prior consent.
|
3 April 2024 |
|
Appeal dismissed as final interdict to restrain use of confidential information was properly granted and dispute is now moot.
Competition – Confidential information – Restraint of trade – Use of competitor’s confidential business information by new employer – Final interdict – Mootness of appeal due to effluxion of time.
|
2 April 2024 |
