profile image

Special Tribunal of South Africa

The Special Tribunal has a statutory mandate to recover public funds syphoned from the fiscus through corruption, fraud and illicit money flows. Special tribunals differ from ordinary civil proceedings which are adversarial in nature. The Special Tribunal adopts a more flexible and expeditious approach to legal actions, its proceedings are inquisitorial in nature and characterised by extensive pre-trial investigations.

Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Special Tribunals

Physical address
Booysens Magistrate Court Corner Rifle Range and Amanda Streets, Turffontein, Johannesburg South
10 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Case actions
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
August 2024

Administrative law – review of decisions to award tenders and contracts concluded pursuant thereto – whether the tenders and contracts should be declared invalid and set aside – just and equitable relief – whether the tenderers should be divested profits earned from invalid tenders.

16 August 2024

Administrative Law – Legality review – Procurement processes.

Administrative law – legality review in terms of s 8 (2) of the Special Investigating Unit and Special Tribunals Act 74 of 1996 – whether functionaries of the second respondent failed to comply with the applicable procurement prescripts when they awarded contracts to the first respondent – just and equitable relief.

5 August 2024
July 2024

Civil procedure – confirmation of rule nisi – whether a proper case is made out for an order confirming the rule nisi – whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant an interdict preserving funds held in a Pension Fund.

31 July 2024

Civil procedure – review of Special Tribunal judgement – administrative action.

Civil procedure – review of Special Tribunal judgement – jurisdiction to review.

Civil procedure – whether a Tribunal judgment is reviewable in terms of s 6 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) – whether the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to review its own decisions – whether the judgment is reviewable.

Held – Tribunal judgments being expressly excluded from the definition of administrative action, they are not reviewable under PAJA – the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over a review application brought in terms of s 22 of the Superior Courts Act, 10 of 2013 on the procedure set out in Rule 53 of the Uniform Rules – review relief is incompetent when sought against the legal effect of an order and not the method of the proceedings.

30 July 2024

Special Tribunal – Legality review - Exceptions

24 July 2024

Special Tribunal – Legality Review – Exceptions

24 July 2024
May 2024

Civil remedies – Injunctions and interdicts – Interim interdict

16 May 2024

Civil Procedure – Pleadings – Amendment to Pleadings

3 May 2024
February 2024

Administrative Law – legality review – unreasonable delay – whether the Department of Transport, KwaZulu-Natal irregularly awarded a tender to Nexor 312 (Pty) Ltd and whether the tender falls to be reviewed and set aside – whether the Special Investigating Unit’s report into the awarding of this tender is irrational and falls to be reviewed and set aside.

27 February 2024

Administrative Law – administrative review – irregular award of public procurement contract

7 February 2024