background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
8 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
8 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 1979
Whether a letter acknowledging future commission created an enforceable undertaking by the principal to pay a third party.
Contract – Interpretation of written undertaking – ambiguity in letter acknowledging future commission – whether letter constituted unqualified undertaking by employer to pay third party – admissibility and scope of extrinsic evidence to resolve ambiguity – acceptance of stipulation in favour of third party – reliance/estoppel and liability of principal for agent’s conduct – condonation of late appeal.
5 June 1979
Whether an ambiguous letter constituted an enforceable undertaking and when extrinsic evidence may be used to imply contractual obligation.
Contract interpretation — written instrument (Exhibit A) ambiguous — whether it constituted an unconditional undertaking to pay a third party’s creditor — admissibility of surrounding circumstances and extrinsic evidence only where instrument ambiguous and existence of contractual obligation established — reliance/trust (estoppel) argument considered but minority view.
5 June 1979
Whether work-injury patients in a closed teaching hospital are private patients for physician fees; appeal dismissed.

* Workmen's Compensation / Ongevallewet – B.O.D. patients – status in closed teaching hospitals – not private patients for doctors' fees unless treated within authorised limited private practice. Criminal law – fraud – false representation and mens rea – applicant's contemporaneous letters and conduct relevant to honest belief. Medical practice – head of department claiming fees for work done by subordinates – not decided but potentially permissible if patients are private.

4 June 1979
Driver in a sudden emergency who braked instinctively was not negligent for not swerving or sounding horn.
Delict — motor collision — sudden emergency — objective standard judged by driver’s knowledge at moment not by hindsight; failure to swerve or to sound horn not negligent on these facts; force of collision not dispositive without supporting evidence.
4 June 1979
The appellant's death sentence for murder upheld; death for robbery replaced with 12 years' imprisonment.

* Criminal law – murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances – mitigating factors (youth, education, intoxication, influence of co‑accused) – appellate review of sentencing discretion – appropriateness of death sentence where victim's death forms basis of separate murder conviction.

4 June 1979
Taxation of costs is part of judicial proceedings; only advocates or attorneys may appear before the taxing master.
Taxation of bills of costs — Right of audience — Taxing master as court officer — Non‑qualified taxing consultants not entitled to appear — Rules and statutes do not displace common‑law prohibition — Local practice insufficient to establish right.
1 June 1979
Whether the respondent’s testimony and admissions sufficiently proved paternity despite the corroboration rule.
Family law – Paternity – proof on balance of probabilities – role of corroborative (stawende) evidence and weight of admissions and circumstantial facts. Damages – kraamkoste and loss of earnings – separate awards permissible where loss of earnings not subsumed in agreed kraamkoste. Civil procedure / professional conduct – improper interviewing of a vulnerable litigant and taking sworn statements at maintenance inquiry condemned. Evidence – blood-group tests which do not exclude paternity admissible but not conclusive.
1 June 1979
The appellants' gang-conspiracy murder convictions and sentences, including death and life terms, were upheld; duress defence failed.

Criminal law – Murder – Gang-organised killing in prison cell – Credibility of convict eyewitnesses and prison officers – Conspiracy and common purpose liability – Duress/compulsion defence and partial-excuse rule – Extenuating circumstances and death sentence – Appellate review of credibility findings.

1 June 1979