background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
6 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
6 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
August 1979
Whether eyewitness and medical evidence proved dolus eventualis when the appellant allegedly ran over the deceased with his vehicle.

* Criminal law – homicide – whether eyewitness and medical evidence established dolus eventualis where accused’s vehicle ran over deceased. Evidence – assessment of contradictory eyewitness testimony and impact of accused’s falsehoods. Forensic pathology – compatibility of subdural haemorrhage and absence of skull fracture with allegation of wheel passing over head. Sentencing – appellate power to alter conviction and sentence where reasonable doubt exists about intent.

31 August 1979
The applicant’s revenge-driven, premeditated murders did not constitute mitigating circumstances; appeal dismissed.

Criminal law – Murder – Mitigating (extenuating) circumstances – revenge and grief do not necessarily amount to mitigation; appellate review of assessors’ divergent views; legal limits on reserving death sentence to ‘most extreme’ cases.

27 August 1979
Whether a printed auction exemption clause bars vendor liability for pre-auction representations and whether ambiguity invokes contra proferentem.
Contract interpretation – printed auction sale conditions – exemption clause – whether clause precludes reliance on prior representations – ambiguity – contra proferentem applies; auctioneer versus vendor liability; exception to alternative plea.
24 August 1979
Court construes s.21(1C): insurer alone may elect statutory undertaking; court cannot prescribe detailed content without insurer’s consent; instalments need not be prefixed by a lump sum.
Motor Vehicle Insurance Act s.21(1C)(a)–(b) — construction of insurer’s statutory undertaking — insurer’s election to furnish undertaking — scope of court’s power to prescribe contents — undertaking limits: reasonable costs in categories of hospital accommodation, treatment, services, goods — s.21(1C)(b) — no requirement to quantify globular lump sum; court may direct instalment schedule; instalments cease on death/at 60.
24 August 1979
A landlocked owner is entitled to a permanent right of way; court fixes route, width and compensation.
Servitudes – right of way of necessity (jus viae) – distinction between jus viae precario and jus viae plenum – route selection rule: nearest and least damage – proof required as to necessity, route, width and compensation – magistrate’s court jurisdiction to determine and order registration of right of way – assessment of justum pretium.
24 August 1979
The respondent's version preferred; the driver was negligent and the applicant's appeal dismissed.
Motor-vehicle negligence — causation — credibility of witnesses — admissibility and weight of police statements and inquest evidence — effect of post‑accident conduct and blood‑alcohol result — appellate assessment of probabilities; costs — two counsel refused.
23 August 1979