background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
27 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
27 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 1979
Driver liable where applicant's bus moved with open door, creating foreseeable risk to the respondent.
Delict – negligence – foreseeability and duty to guard against passenger boarding of moving buses in congested areas. Transport law – driver’s control of bus doors and responsibility to prevent boarding while vehicle is moving. Causation – omission to close bus door can be causa causans when omission is sufficiently linked to injury. Speed – slow movement does not necessarily negate foreseeability of harm from boarding a moving bus.
28 September 1979
In an instalment sale, clause requiring payment "only when I shall have made payment" mandates payment before transfer; guarantee insufficient.

* Property/Contracts – instalment (hire-purchase) sale of land – interpretation of clause requiring payment before transfer – future perfect tense and limiting adverb indicate payment must precede transfer. Remedies – banker's guarantee not equivalent to payment under an instalment sale. Distinction from cash sale authorities permitting guarantees against registration (Breytenbach). Statutory Acts (Sale of Land on Instalments Act; Hire-Purchase Act) inapplicable.

27 September 1979
In an instalment (hire-purchase) sale the respondent must pay the full purchase price before transfer; a guarantee is not payment.
Sale on instalments/hire-purchase; construction of transfer clause requiring payment before registration; future-perfect tense and "only when" imply payment precedes transfer; banker’s guarantee is not payment; Breytenbach principle inapplicable to instalment contracts.
27 September 1979
Directors’ surety held to cover post-lease company debts where company continued trading and respondent recognised it as occupier.
Civil procedure; suretyship — directors’ personal guarantee for company debts — scope of guarantee covering "all sums" owing; lease expiry and post-lease conduct — tacit relocation and tacit contracts; identity of debtor — company v. purported sole proprietor; evidentiary consequences where appellants close case and respondent’s evidence remains uncontradicted; oral cancellation / implied term not established.
27 September 1979
Failure to detect and treat a developing postoperative compartment syndrome constituted negligence causally causing the disabling injury.
Medical negligence — post‑operative care — failure to detect and treat compartment (Volkmann’s) syndrome; causation: ischemia plus superimposed staphylococcal sepsis; duty to decompress circumferential plaster and to act on nursing reports; quantum — allowance for future contingencies (possible amputation/prosthesis).
27 September 1979
Conviction upheld where accomplice evidence, corroborated by licence‑plate switching and general probabilities, satisfied the cautionary rule.

* Criminal law – Evidence – Accomplice testimony – Cautionary rule – Whether corroboration or strong general probabilities can sustain conviction based on accomplice evidence; corroboration by licence‑plate/disc switching and consideration of interpreter-related inconsistencies.

27 September 1979
Whether residue vested at testator’s death or on the will’s fixed later date and whether surplus income accrues to capital.
Wills — interpretation — vesting of residue — dies cedit vs dies venit — whether residuary bequest vests at testator’s death or on later fixed date — substitution provisions — surplus income prior to distribution date — accumulation to capital — admissibility of surrounding (arm‑chair) evidence to resolve latent ambiguities.
27 September 1979
Conviction for neighbouring-house robbery overturned where identification and proximity evidence failed to exclude reasonable doubt.

* Criminal law – identification evidence – reliance on contemporaneous events and similarities between neighbouring offences – necessity for independent proof beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence – weight of time estimates elicited by leading questions. Sentencing – adjustment of cumulative effective sentence where one conviction set aside on appeal.

27 September 1979
No oral lease or delictual liability where written drafts required head-office signature and no binding agreement was proved.
Lease law – requirement of head-office signature in draft leases (Clause 11 / 60-day clause) precludes finding of binding oral lease; Delict – negligent misstatement and duty of care claims dismissed where no representation or duty established; Administrative failure to exercise option not creating liability to tenant.
27 September 1979
Whether a newspaper’s footnote implied the respondent retired for misconduct and whether damages were excessive.
Defamation — meaning of words — reasonable ordinary reader — per se libel in headline/lead paragraph; Footnote and contextual interpretation — whether a separate defamatory insinuation arises; Assessment of damages — mitigation by subsequent reports, absence of apology, publication magnitude; Publisher’s responsibility — amplification and presentation can amount to originator conduct; Use of comparative precedent awards and adjustment for differences and inflation.
27 September 1979
Whether respondent validly paid a preferential loan to a director without proper company authorisation.

Contract — preferential dealer arrangement — interest‑free loan payable subject to conditions — bank guarantee issued and handed to director — requirement of company board authorisation — validity of board resolution and forged/defective authorisation — waiver and estoppel — proof on balance of probabilities — appellate reassessment of credibility — respondent liable for R47,520 plus interest and costs.

27 September 1979
Appellant’s claim failed because parties’ internal arrangement made payment to the director effective as payment to the company.

Contract law – Variation of payment method – Whether payment to director discharged lender’s obligation; Corporate authority – conduct of sole directors/shareholders; Credibility findings – appellate review; Interpretation of clauses permitting variation of payment (clause 4(b)) vs written amendment clause (7(d)).

27 September 1979
Whether a defendant who restrained the victim, facilitating a co‑offender’s fatal attack, is guilty as an accomplice.

Criminal law — Murder — Accomplice (medeplichtigheid) — Conscious identification and assistance required — Causal nexus between assistance and killing — Mere presence insufficient; spectator who does not facilitate not guilty as accomplice.

25 September 1979
A procedural summons-delivery requirement to the Fund is directory; substantial compliance entitles claimants to compensation.

Motor Vehicle Assurance Fund; regulation 5(1)(b)(i) — delivery of summons — directory not peremptory; substantial compliance; statutory interpretation — "shall" not always mandatory; purpose of Act to protect third parties; no prejudice, claimant entitled to compensation and costs.

25 September 1979
A bank-conditioned payment arising from a forced sale was not in the ordinary course of business and is a voidable preference.
Insolvency Act s.29(1) – voidable preferences – ordinary course of business test – tripartite agreement forming disposition – forced sale/defalcation undermining ordinary-course character – evidentiary onus on alleged preferred creditor to prove ordinary course and absence of intention to prefer.
25 September 1979
Whether appellant's shooting was justified under section 49; court held it was not and upheld culpable homicide conviction.

Criminal law – Culpable homicide v. justifiable killing under s49 Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 – Use of deadly force to effect arrest or prevent escape – Reasonableness of methods and proximity – Judicial over-questioning not necessarily fatal to conviction.

25 September 1979
Repeated receipt of stolen goods and refusal to testify undermined mitigation; custodial sentence of twelve months upheld.

* Criminal law – sentencing – receipt of stolen goods – repeated purchases increase culpability and justify custodial sentence. Sentencing – mitigation – refusal to testify under oath and unsupported claims of fear diminish weight of mitigation. Appellate review – whether trial court considered alternatives to imprisonment and personal circumstances before sentencing.

25 September 1979
Attendance at a wake involving collective singing of political songs may constitute a prohibited "gathering" under the Riotous Assemblies Act.
Riotous Assemblies Act – definition of "gathering" – "common purpose" and "concerted action" – attendance to listen or sing can constitute concerted action – statutory construction and individual liberty.
25 September 1979
Section 103 inapplicable where an arm’s‑length share sale with commercially normal terms effected dividend avoidance.
Income tax — section 103 tax‑avoidance provisions — requirements: (a) transaction, (b) effect of avoiding anticipated liability, (c) abnormal means/manner or abnormal rights/obligations, (d) subjective purpose — application to arms‑length share sale with repayment of director loans; s86A appeal — full rehearing on fact and law.
20 September 1979
Section 1(2) of the Banks Act is a prima facie deeming provision; attempted fraud conviction overturned for lack of duty to disclose.

Banks Act s1(2) — deeming provision is supplementary and prima facie, not exhaustive; absence of Registrar’s opinion does not bar prosecution under s7(1); fraud by concealment requires a duty to disclose to the alleged victim; indictment must fairly and precisely plead the form of fraud relied upon.

20 September 1979
An owner without prior possession may sue for delictual damages for unlawful occupation if wrongfulness, fault and damage are proved.
Property/infringement of ownership – unlawful occupation or use – owner without prior possession entitled to sue in delict (actio legis Aquiliae) for economic loss if wrongfulness, fault and damage established; caution against importing narrow English 'trespass' possessory doctrine.
18 September 1979
Juvenile caning under section 294(1) must be imposed in lieu of any other punishment, not in addition to it.

Criminal law – Sentencing – Section 294(1) corporal punishment for males under 21 – whipping is discretionary and must be imposed in lieu of other punishment; cannot be conjoined with suspended imprisonment – remedy where whipping already administered is deletion of additional punishment.

18 September 1979
Appellate court set aside death sentences for gang robbery of elderly victims and imposed 15-year terms, finding no "extreme case."

Sentencing — Death penalty as discretionary — "Extreme case" requirement — Appellate interference with sentencing discretion where no reasonable court could have imposed sentence — Gang robbery of elderly victims; whether facts justify death sentence — Separate counts and competence to alter sentence on unappealed counts.

14 September 1979
Court set aside murder convictions, finding no subjective foresight; substituted culpable homicide and assault convictions with reduced sentences.

Criminal law – murder (dolus eventualis) – requirement of subjective foresight – distinction between objective foreseeability and subjective foresight; strafbare manslag (culpable homicide) as alternative; common purpose and liability of bystander/instigator; assessment of evidence where witnesses are young and intoxicated.

11 September 1979
A contractor who disposes of a machine without proper enquiries may be liable where the owner did not abandon it.
Property law – proof of ownership by oral evidence where documentary proof absent; Property law – abandonment – prolonged unattended storage does not necessarily amount to abandonment; Wrongful disposal – duties of occupier/contractor to enquire before disposing of chattels found on site; Damages – assessment where best evidence is imperfect; court may make reasonable valuation and deduct depreciation.
11 September 1979
Appellant insurer failed to prove insured was intoxicated at collision; post‑mortem alcohol may be from fermentation.
Insurance — exclusion for loss caused by insured being intoxicated — burden on insurer to prove intoxication and causal contribution; post‑mortem blood alcohol evidence — risk of post‑mortem fermentation where sampling delayed and preservation inadequate, especially with diabetic/obese decedent; circumstantial evidence must be assessed cumulatively on balance of probabilities.
4 September 1979
Appellants’ appeal dismissed; State liable for unlawful warrantless arrests by police acting within scope of duty; s32(1) notice sufficed.
Police law – unlawful entry to private dwelling – arrest without warrant – vicarious liability of State for police officers acting within scope of employment – section 32(1) pre-action notice: substance sufficient, misidentification of arresting officer not fatal.
4 September 1979