background image
profile image

Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction. The Court was first established by the Interim Constitution of 1993, and its first session began in February 1995. It has continued in existence under the Constitution of 1996. The Court sits in the city of Johannesburg. The Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so. (Banner image credit: By André-Pierre from Stellenbosch, South Africa.)
Physical address
Constitutional Court, 1 Hospital Street, Constitution Hill, Braamfontein, South Africa, 2017
32 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Case actions
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
32 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2024
Reported
A municipality must reasonably provide temporary emergency accommodation near inner‑city evictees where gentrification foreseeably displaces them.
Constitutional law – socio‑economic rights – right of access to adequate housing (s 26) – temporary emergency accommodation – locality and ‘as near as possible’ standard; reasonableness and progressive realisation; non‑retrogression and gentrification; municipal obligations to plan and mitigate displacement; remedies and mandatory relief.
20 December 2024
Reported
A valid VDA that includes interest precludes a taxpayer from seeking remission of that VAT interest post‑VDA.
Tax law – VAT interest – section 39(7) remission – availability after conclusion of voluntary disclosure agreement (VDA). Tax Administration Act – Voluntary Disclosure Programme (sections 225–233) – VDA finality and enforceability; interest expressly incorporated in VDAs. Administrative law – PAJA – no duty to consider a request when substantive power to grant relief is lacking. Statutory interpretation – in pari materia construction of TAA and VAT Act; legislative memorandum and related provisions (eg s89quat) support exclusion of post‑VDA interest remission. Costs – Biowatch protection denied; costs including two counsel awarded to the Commissioner.
20 December 2024
Reported
A court may not convict solely on a recanted section 204 statement without adequate safeguards and corroboration.
Criminal procedure — section 204 witness statements — admissibility where witness recants; Hearsay Act (definition of hearsay) — extra‑curial statements by testifying declarant not hearsay; Criminal Procedure Act ss 219/219A — do not bar statements by non‑accused witnesses; procedural safeguard — trial‑within‑a‑trial to assess voluntariness and reliability; reliability assessment — procedural and substantive indicia, videotaping and corroboration; fair trial rights (s35) — right to challenge and adduce evidence.
20 December 2024
Reported
Statutory authorisation for traditional councils to levy compulsory rates is unconstitutional; only legislatures may impose taxes.
Constitutional law — Taxing power reserved to elected legislatures — Delegation to Executive or traditional leaders impermissible; traditional levies authorised by statute constitute taxes when compulsory, uniform, paid into a general fund and used for public/traditional-council purposes — Section 25 of Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act 6 of 2005 declared unconstitutional and invalid.
20 December 2024
Reported
Whether an employer may fairly dismiss on grounds of age after an employee continues beyond agreed/normal retirement age.
Labour law – s187(1)(f) & s187(2)(b) LRA – age discrimination and automatically unfair dismissal; scope of protection for dismissal 'based on age' when employee continues beyond agreed/normal retirement age; employer’s election/waiver; remedy – 24 months’ remuneration.
20 December 2024
Reported
Executive control of boards, short renewable judge assignments and Executive removals undermine military judicial independence.
Constitutional law; military courts as ‘courts’ and military judges as ‘judicial officers’ – judicial independence; Defence Act s101–102 – Executive‑convened boards of inquiry investigating judges unconstitutional; MDSMA s15 – short renewable judicial assignments undermine security of tenure; MDSMA s17 – removal by Executive without independent inquiry unconstitutional; interim remedies: reading down/exclusion, two‑year non‑renewal rule, independent inquiry prerequisite; declarations suspended 24 months for remedial legislation.
20 December 2024
Reported
A non-parole period imposed without notice or findings of exceptional circumstances is invalid and set aside.
Criminal procedure – section 276B CPA – fixing of non-parole period; Procedural fairness – sentencing court must afford parties opportunity to make submissions before fixing non-parole period; Substantive requirement – exceptional circumstances must be established to justify non-parole order; Misconduct in sentencing – failure to invite submissions or record exceptional circumstances is material misdirection; Remedy – non-parole period set aside; leave to appeal convictions refused.
20 December 2024
November 2024
Reported
Municipalities may not impose open‑ended transfer embargoes beyond SPLUMA and the Systems Act; the impugned provisions were invalid.
Municipal law – spatial planning by-laws – transfer/registration embargoes – limits of municipal by‑law making power under s156(2) and s156(5) – SPLUMA s53 – conflict with Systems Act s118 – arbitrary deprivation (s25) – remedy: invalidity of municipal transfer‑embargo provisions.
19 November 2024
October 2024
Reported
Whether specific‑performance proceedings interrupt prescription of a later damages claim arising only upon cancellation.
Prescription — Judicial interruption (s 15 Prescription Act) — Whether motion for specific performance interrupts prescription of a later damages claim that only arises upon cancellation after non‑compliance — Distinction from Allianz and Cadac — Debt defined as existing enforceable right; damages debt accrues on cancellation.
25 October 2024
Reported
Publication of a privately used residential address on social media required removal; public‑domain disclosure does not automatically forfeit privacy.
Constitutional law — section 14 right to privacy — information in public domain; voluntary disclosure and purpose of disclosure; Bernstein dual‑expectation test (subjective and objective); balance with section 16 freedom of expression — public interest activism on social media; whether prior online disclosure extinguishes privacy; pleadings in motion proceedings — limits on relying on new causes of action raised in reply.
9 October 2024
Reported
PAJA review rights with a financial component survive death; material non‑disclosure requires inducement and fair procedure.
PAJA — administrative action — Appeal Board decisions are administrative action; PAJA review rights with financial component transmissible to deceased estate; substitution of executor permitted; procedural fairness — audi alteram partem — administrative bodies must allow opportunity to lead evidence on new unpleaded grounds; Medical Schemes Act s29(2)(e) — material non-disclosure — common-law inducement requirement remains; objective materiality alone insufficient; diagnostic procedures and conditions outside 12‑month window not necessarily material; remedy — substitution appropriate where remittal would be futile.
9 October 2024
Reported
Court upheld the expert Commission’s historical customary‑law findings and set aside the SCA’s re‑evaluation of facts.
Administrative law – judicial review under PAJA – deference to specialist commission findings; Customary law – living customary law assessed as at time events arose (historical inquiry) – ukungena and isifingo as succession mechanisms; Procedural fairness – no mandatory method prescribed for Commission investigations; Appeal vs review – prohibition on courts re‑weighing expert factual findings.
3 October 2024
Reported
Leave to appeal refused; complex remedial constitutional and common‑law issues inadequately pleaded and justice favoured prompt compensation.
Constitutional remedies – section 172(1)(b) – scope of just and equitable orders; Public procurement – unlawful contract extensions; Unjustified enrichment – development of common law; Courts raising issues mero motu; Interests of justice and leave to appeal.
2 October 2024
Reported
Whether paragraph 80(2) confines the conduit principle so capital gains tax stops at the first beneficiary trust.
Income Tax Act — sections 25B and 26A; Eighth Schedule paragraph 80(2) — conduit principle and capital gains; interpretation of paragraph 80(2) in multi‑tier trust structures; allocation of capital gains tax between vesting trust, intermediate trust and ultimate beneficiaries; Tax Administration Act s222 — understatement penalties and bona fide inadvertent error.
2 October 2024
September 2024
Reported
Court extended suspension for two years to allow Parliament meaningful public participation and passage of the Marriage Bill.
Constitutional law — extension of suspension of declaration of invalidity under s172 — urgency — participatory democracy and public involvement in law‑making — Marriage Bill and recognition of Muslim marriages — prejudice and prospects of legislative cure.
18 September 2024
August 2024
Reported
Section 59(3)’s "30 days" refers only to days when a Regular Force member is obliged to be on official duty.
Defence Act s59(3) – interpretation of "30 days" – whether calendar days or only duty days; exclusion of weekends/public holidays that are not duty days; consequences where s59(3) not triggered – competence of reinstatement, declaratory relief and arrear remuneration; statutory interpretation in light of disciplinary purpose and Constitution s39(2).
21 August 2024
Reported
Appointment of a curator ad litem does not remove section 13(1) protection for a mentally incapacitated creditor.
Prescription Act s13(1)(a),(i) — mental incapacity — appointment of curator ad litem — does not terminate impediment; interplay with s12(3) unnecessary to decide; right of access to courts (s34) and s39(2) interpretation obligations; Endumeni applied.
15 August 2024
July 2024
Reported
Premier must refer contested customary leadership nominations to provincial and local houses under section 12(2).
Traditional leadership — Interpretation of section 12(1)–(2) Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act — only one statutory royal family per recognised traditional community may identify headman/headwoman — where competing identifications or allegations of non‑compliance exist Premier must consider section 12(2) options, notably referral to provincial and relevant local houses of traditional leaders — Premier’s decision reviewable if based on erroneous material or failure to exercise discretion — further decision‑making to take into account TKLA s2(1) obligations (non‑discrimination, equality, gender representation).
17 July 2024
Reported
Whether a grant provider’s lawful, innocent interest in property falls within POCA’s definition of "interest" for forfeiture exclusion.
POCA – definition of "interest" – wide, non‑exhaustive meaning – exclusion from forfeiture; preservation of pre‑existing innocent interests; ranking competing claims by common‑law principles (real rights over personal rights; prior tempore potior est iure).
12 July 2024
June 2024
Reported
A registered union is bound by its constitution and cannot represent employees it cannot validly admit as members.
Labour Relations Act ss 161 & 200 — legal standing of trade unions; trade union constitution — scope of membership binding; admission outside registered scope ultra vires and void; representation by legal practitioner under s161(1)(a) distinct from union authority under s200; application of Lufil precedent.
21 June 2024
Reported
Whether delegated fund-management operations can satisfy the section 9D foreign business establishment exemption.
Income Tax Act s9D – foreign business establishment (FBE) – meaning of “business” and “primary operations”; delegation/outsourcing of functions; distinction between fund management (oversight/regulatory responsibility) and investment trading; purposive interpretation balancing anti-deferral and international competitiveness; economic substance requirement for FBE.
21 June 2024
Reported
Direct access refused; High Court’s dismissal of premature acting‑leader recognition and sought substitute relief was incompetent.
Constitutional jurisdiction — traditional leadership recognition; direct access to Constitutional Court — interests of justice; prematurity of acting-leader appointment; judicial review for failure to make a decision; functus officio and limits on remedial substitution; parties bound by pleadings; urgency in urgent-motion procedure.
21 June 2024
May 2024
Reported
Consent order requiring municipal purchase of properties set aside for statutory non‑compliance and attorney’s lack of authority.
Consent orders and settlements — Eke requirements — relation to lis, consistency with Constitution and statute, practical advantage; municipal agents’ authority — municipality may not be bound to acquire immovable property absent prior statutory compliance (section 79(24) LGO, Structures Act); rescission of consent orders — common law grounds, delay and discretion; condonation for late filings; costs.
31 May 2024
Reported
Majority: prenuptial maintenance clause may co-exist with antenuptial contract; ousting section 7 not properly before court.
Matrimonial property — Prenuptial agreement providing for maintenance — Relationship with antenuptial contract — Enforceability as donation vs. contract — Section 7 Divorce Act — Whether prenuptial maintenance ousts court discretion — Pleadings and scope of appeal.
22 May 2024
Reported
s189A(13)(d) can be standalone compensation; s189A(18) does not oust Labour Court’s s189A(13) jurisdiction.
Labour law – mass retrenchments – section 189A(13): remedial hierarchy and availability of (d) compensation as standalone relief; section 189A(18): scope — precludes adjudication under s191(5)(b)(ii) only, does not oust s189A(13) jurisdiction; procedural fairness and consultation obligations; selection criteria (knowledge, skills and behaviour); reinstatement primary remedy for substantive unfairness; costs awarded.
21 May 2024
Reported
Majority refused direct access/leave: OCNS held functional; applicants’ non‑compliance due to tardiness; dissent favoured PAJA review and proactive investigation by the Commission.
Electoral law — Election timetables and section 27 compliance — OCNS (online nomination portal) functionality — objective impossibility to comply — Commission’s power under s20(2)(a) to amend timetable — PAJA review for failure to consider complaints — Plascon‑Evans approach to disputes of fact in urgent electoral motion proceedings — direct access and issue estoppel under s96(1) Electoral Act — admissibility of further evidence and co‑respondent affidavits.
20 May 2024
Reported
A finally convicted and sentenced respondent is disqualified under section 47(1)(e), and remission does not negate that sentence.
Constitutional law – section 47(1)(e) – interpretation and operation of proviso; Presidential remission – administrative effect on execution of sentence not retrospective alteration of judicial sentence; civil contempt – criminal conviction for disqualification purposes; Electoral Act – Commission empowered to determine candidate eligibility; recusal – double requirement of reasonableness; no reasonable apprehension of bias from general, non‑specific public statement by Commissioner.
20 May 2024
Reported
Delictual debts based on alleged presidential unconstitutionality became due on the facts and prescribed before constitutional confirmation.
Prescription — delictual claims against State organs — cause of action completed when wrongful conduct and damage occur and creditor has identity/facts; Constitutional Court confirmation not precondition to debt becoming due; Institution Act condonation requires court to decide prescription; interruption under Prescription Act requires process whereby creditor claims payment; third‑party review/intervention did not interrupt prescription here.
6 May 2024
April 2024
Reported
A court may not unilaterally alter a parties’ settlement agreement without giving them the opportunity to be heard.
Settlement agreements – Courts’ power to make compromises orders of court; limits on judicial intervention; Eke requirements (must relate to dispute; not offensive to law/public policy; practical advantage); audi alteram partem; inadmissible evidence; separation of powers and public-funds oversight.
25 April 2024
Reported
Whether rule 39(2)(b) permits de novo review and the correct causation test for merger‑specific retrenchments.
Competition law — mergers — Commission rule 39(1)–(2): special statutory review requiring Tribunal to decide afresh whether a firm has substantially complied with merger conditions; causation — test for merger‑specific retrenchments requires factual (but‑for) and legal/proximate causation; mere ‘some nexus’ to controller incentives insufficient; appellate deference to Tribunal’s specialised factual findings.
17 April 2024
Reported
Rule 46A covers residential property held by trusts; occupiers may be affected, but ESTA/PIE protections can obviate notice.
Execution – Rule 46A – Execution against residential immovable property of a judgment debtor – Applicability to property registered in name of juristic persons (trusts) if property is residential by character and use – Distinction between provisions directed at a judgment debtor’s primary residence and those applying to residential property generally – Rule 46A(3)(b) notice to “any other party who may be affected” – Interaction with ESTA, PIE and huur gaat voor koop – Standing and constitutional jurisdiction.
12 April 2024
Reported
A free loan-cover insurance supply can be taxable; s16(3)(c) deductions require apportionment when supplies are partly exempt.
VAT — free-of-charge supplies — a supply for no consideration may still be a taxable supply if made in the course or furtherance of an enterprise; section 10(23) valuation rule does not determine taxability; section 16(3)(c) deduction for payments under insurance contracts; mixed supplies — part taxable/part exempt — apportionment required; section 17 input-tax apportionment does not directly govern s16(3)(c) but apportionment is implied by statutory scheme; capitalisation of fees does not change their character.
12 April 2024